Search Results

0 results for 'Elevate'

You can use to get even better search results
April 18, 2011 |

2011 APPELLATE HOT LIST

The firms we honored this year are: Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld; Baker Botts; Covington & Burling; Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher; Hogan Lovells; Jenner & Block; Jones Day; Kellogg, Huber, Hansen, Todd, Evans & Figel; King & Spalding; Latham & Watkins; Mayer Brown; Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe; Proskauer Rose; Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan; Robbins, Russell, Englert, Orseck, Untereiner & Sauber; Sidley Austin; and Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr.
20 minute read
Mei Fun Wong v. Holder, 08-5328-ag
Publication Date: 2011-02-02
Practice Area: Immigration Law
Industry:
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Judge: Before: Raggi, Hall, C.JJ. and Carman, J.2
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Henry Hwang (Theodore N. Cox, on the brief), New York, New York, for Petitioners.
For defendant: D. Nicholas Harling, Trial Attorney (Tony West, Assistant Attorney General, Jamie M. Dowd, Senior Litigation Counsel, on the brief), Office of Immigration Litigation, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, Washington D.C., for Respondent.
Case number: 08-5328-ag

Cite as: Mei Fun Wong v. Holder, 08-5328-ag, NYLJ 1202479998972, at *1 (2d Cir., Decided February 1, 2011)Before: Raggi, Hall, C.JJ. and Carman, J.2

January 30, 2003 |

The Early 1900s: A Society in Flux

The Law Journal editors joined in the hue and cry against the unbridled growth of trusts, calling for legislation regulating the formation and operation of corporate combinations. New Jersey was, due to its peculiarly lax corporation laws, a beckoning home to corporate trusts.
37 minute read
March 02, 2007 |

New Partners Yearbook 2007

The Law Journal's eighth annual New Partners Yearbook features 149 lawyers who made the grade at New Jersey firms in the past 12 months.
47 minute read
August 31, 2007 |

Duty of School Boards Expanded

This term, the Supreme Court focused on completing the formulation of standards governing the trial of AICRA cases.
63 minute read
July 11, 2002 |

Inside the D.C. Top 20 Firms

Legal Times' annual survey looks at the financial performance of the highest-grossing law firms in the D.C. area. What thriving practice kept Arnold & Porter in the top spot? How did Covington & Burling fare? Why did Crowell & Moring's revenue spike? How has Latham & Watkins made itself a major player in the Washington market?
36 minute read
February 28, 2008 |

The Cal Law 25: Firm by Firm

19 minute read
December 16, 2009 |

New Jersey Bar Examination Essay Questions and Answers - July 2009

Questions from the July 2009 bar examination and sample answers by high-scoring passers.
96 minute read
US v. NYC Bd. of Educ., 08-5171-cv (L)
Publication Date: 2011-05-09
Practice Area: Civil Rights
Industry:
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Judge: Before: Calabresi, Raggi, and Cudahy,1 C.JJ.
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Michael E. Rosman (Christopher J. Hajec, on the brief), Center for Individual Rights, Washington, DC, for John Brennan, James Ahearn, Scott Spring, Dennis Mortensen, John Mitchell, Eric Schauer, and Ruben Miranda. Gregory B. Friel, (Dennis J. Dimsey and April J. Anderson, on the brief) for Loretta King, Acting Assistant Attorney General, Civil Rights Division, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for the United States, the Attorney General, the Assistant Attorney General, and the Department of Justice. Araceli Martinez-Olguin, (Emily J. Martin and Lenora M. Lapidus, on the brief), American Civil Liberties Union Foundation Women's Right's Project, New York, NY, for Janet Caldero et al. Matthew Colangelo, (John Payton, Debo P. Adegbile, and Joy Milligan, on the brief), NAACP Legal Defense & Education Fund, Inc., New York, NY; Joshua Civin, NAACP Legal Defense & Education Fund, Washington, DC, for Pedro Arroyo et al. Rachael N. Pine, Gillian L. Thomas, Legal Momentum, New York, NY, for Amicus Curiae Legal Momentum.
For defendant: The New York City Department of Education, the City of New York, Martha K. Hirst, and the New York City Department of Citywide Administrative Services, did not appear at oral argument and did not submit a brief.
Case number: 08-5171-cv (L)

Cite as: US v. NYC Bd. of Educ., 08-5171-cv (L), NYLJ 1202493194832, at *1 (2d Cir., Decided May 5, 2011)Before: Calabresi, Raggi, and Cudahy,1 C.JJ.

May 22, 2008 |

Unpublished Opinions

Unpublished state and federal court opinions.
39 minute read

Resources