Search Results

0 results for 'Drinker Biddle Reath LLP'

You can use to get even better search results
October 09, 2006 |

A-B

7 minute read
November 06, 2009 |

D.C. Court of Appeals Resurrects Cell Phone Radiation Cases

The D.C. Court of Appeals last week revived a series of lawsuits by individuals who say they were harmed by cell phone radiation, adding yet another wrinkle to a debate within U.S. courts over whether national regulations trump state laws when it comes to issues surrounding cell phone safety. The decision gave both sides of the case fodder to declare victory -- but some lawyers said the ruling could lead to the filing of even more suits against cell phone companies in Washington's trial court.
5 minute read
October 02, 2013 |

License Revocation Order Pursuant to Rule 1:28-2(c)

Notice to the bar.
30 minute read
MBIA Inc. v. Federal Ins. Co., 10-0355-cv (L)
Publication Date: 2011-07-06
Practice Area: Business Law
Industry:
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Judge: Before: Sack, Lynch, C.JJ., and Preska, Ch. D.J.*
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: For Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant: Robert H. Shulman, Kasowitz, Benson, Torres & Friedman LLP,** New York, NY.
For defendant: For Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee Federal Insurance Co.: Christopher T. Handman (David J. Hensler and Jessica L. Ellsworth, on the brief), Hogan Lovells US LLP, Washington, D.C. For Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee ACE American Insurance Co.: Alan J. Joaquin (Janet R. McFadden, on the brief), Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP, Washington, D.C.
Case number: 10-0355-cv (L)

Cite as: MBIA Inc. v. Federal Ins. Co., 10-0355-cv (L), NYLJ 1202499327260, at *1 (2d Cir., Decided July 1, 2011)Before: Sack, Lynch, C.JJ., and Preska, Ch. D.J

September 24, 2012 |

Largest Law Firms

59 minute read
November 13, 2006 |

The NLJ 250 Chart (51-100)

6 minute read
August 17, 2012 |

New Leaders of the Bar

The Law Journal's yearly album of profiles of rising stars in the New Jersey legal profession ... all under 40.
73 minute read
May 30, 2013 |

Potential Document Review Pitfall: The Common Interest Doctrine

The potential pitfalls of document review are numerous and, when it comes to matters of privilege, the stakes are high.
8 minute read
December 14, 2012 |

Pharmaceutical Marketing and The N.J. Consumer Fraud Act

Any attempt to punish communications about pharmaceuticals in the absence of proof of falsity, intent, actual deception and injury not only would be inconsistent with the existing interpretation of the Consumer Fraud Act, but also would be barred by the First Amendment.
7 minute read

TRENDING STORIES

    Resources

    • Revenue, Profit, Cash: Managing Law Firms for Success

      Brought to you by Juris Ledger

      Download Now

    • Law Firm Operational Considerations for the Corporate Transparency Act

      Brought to you by Wolters Kluwer

      Download Now

    • The Ultimate Guide to Remote Legal Work

      Brought to you by Filevine

      Download Now

    • Practical Guidance Journal: Protecting Work Product in a Generative AI World

      Brought to you by LexisNexis®

      Download Now