Search Results

0 results for 'Cigna'

You can use to get even better search results
August 31, 2007 |

Inadmissible

Short takes on lawyers, firms and judges.
4 minute read
May 31, 2012 |

Disclosure of Confidential Witnesses in PSLRA Cases

Douglas H. Flaum and Israel David, partners at Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson, write that the recent decisions of the Southern District of New York underscore that courts are disfavoring the argument that a confidential witness list is attorney work product.
11 minute read
August 15, 2013 |

In Practice: Supreme Court Strengthens 'Concepcion'

A recent decision makes it harder to avoid arbitration and may influence pending cases before the California Supreme Court, explains Neil Bardack of Hanson Bridgett.
7 minute read
August 24, 2007 |

Winning the War for Talent: Attracting and Retaining the Best Lawyers

It is impossible to ignore the dramatic shifts in the demographics of the workforce that are taking place in this country.
7 minute read
March 12, 2013 |

SUM Legislation - Good News/Bad News

In their Insurance Law column, Norman H. Dachs and Jonathan A. Dachs, partners at Shayne, Dachs, Sauer & Dachs, discuss the governor's veto of a bill that dealt with the amount of SUM coverage required to be made available to consumers and another bill that was signed into law expanding the definition of "insured" under the SUM Endorsement to include emergency workers who had not been protected when the policy was issued to a fire company or ambulance service.
14 minute read
February 05, 2003 |

Court Unlikely to Block Arbitration of § 17200 Cases

The California Supreme Court didn't seem inclined Tuesday to let plaintiffs who file private attorney general class actions use the state's unfair competition law to avoid arbitration. Specifically, several of the justices expressed concern that doing so would invite abuse of the law, Business and Professions Code § 17200, by encouraging plaintiffs to assert it in all cases seeking injunctive relief from a business.
5 minute read
August 10, 2000 |

Pre-Suit Demand Excused in Derivative Action When Company's Board Evenly Split

Traditionally, the requirement of a pre-suit demand in a derivative case is excused if there is not a majority of disinterested directors to receive the demand. But until now, there was no unequivocal authority to determine how that majority requirement would apply to an evenly divided board. This troublesome question was recently tackled by the Delaware Court of Chancery, which squarely addressed the issue in a decision that impacts Delaware corporations and shareholders alike.
7 minute read
July 18, 2005 |

WellPoint's settlement isn't end of HMO war

Wellpoint Inc.'s recent $200 million settlements with 700,000 doctors and 18 medical societies will not put an end to the six years of litigation against the largest health maintenance organizations in the country.
4 minute read
January 22, 2001 |

Arbitration Clauses Where Employee Pays Are Valid

In separate cases, two federal judges in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania enforced arbitration clauses in employment discrimination cases despite the fact workers may have to bear some of the costs. Finding the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has never addressed the questions raised in their cases, the judges concluded separately that both a "loser pays" provision and a clause calling for both sides to bear the costs equally are enforceable.
7 minute read

TRENDING STORIES

    Resources

    • A Buyer's Guide to Law Firm Software

      Brought to you by PracticePanther

      Download Now

    • A Step-by-Step Flight Plan for Legal Teams: Fire Up Your Productivity Engine and Deliver High-Impact Work Faster

      Brought to you by HaystackID

      Download Now

    • Corporate Transparency Act Resource Kit

      Brought to you by Wolters Kluwer

      Download Now

    • Revenue, Profit, Cash: Managing Law Firms for Success

      Brought to you by Juris Ledger

      Download Now