• George v. Liberty Ins. Corp.

    Publication Date: 2019-01-17
    Practice Area: Evidence | Personal Injury
    Industry:
    Court: Appellate Division
    Judge: Judge Fuentes
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: A-2123-15T1

    Plaintiff appealed the denial of his motion for a new trial in his action over injuries from an automobile accident.

  • State of New Jersey v. Anthony D. Parker

    Publication Date: 2019-01-17
    Practice Area: Constitutional Law | Criminal Law | Evidence
    Industry:
    Court: Appellate Division
    Judge: Per Curiam
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: A-4108-16T1

    The defendant appealed from a judgment of conviction for second-degree certain persons not to have weapons.

  • J.M. v. T.F.

    Publication Date: 2019-01-17
    Practice Area: Civil Procedure | Evidence | Family Law
    Industry:
    Court: Appellate Division
    Judge: Per Curiam
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: A-2621-16T4

    Defendant appealed from a final restraining order entered in favor of plaintiff pursuant to the Prevention of Domestic Violence Act of 1991.

  • State of New Jersey v. Allistair Mingo

    Publication Date: 2019-01-16
    Practice Area: Criminal Law | Evidence
    Industry:
    Court: Appellate Division
    Judge: Per Curiam
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: A-4762-17T4

    Defendant pled guilty to a third-degree conspiracy to possess a controlled substance with the intent to distribute in 2001.

  • New York Law Journal

    The Power of Administrative Agencies and the Peril of Substantial Evidence Review

    January 16, 2019

    In his New York Practice column, Thomas F. Gleason writes: The scope of deference to administrative agencies was recently treated by a divided panel of the Appellate Division, Third Department, whose decision in an Article 78 substantial evidence proceeding was reversed by a divided Court of Appeals in 'Matter of Haug v. State University of N.Y. at Potsdam'. The disturbing facts and the review standard make compelling reading—and not just for lawyers.

  • People v. K.S.

    Publication Date: 2019-01-16
    Practice Area: Criminal Law | Evidence
    Industry:
    Court: Criminal Court, New York County
    Judge: Judge Althea Drysdale
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: For the People: ADA Katherine Demartini
    for defendant: For the Defendant: Ying-Ying Ma, Esq.

    Case Number: 2017 NY 003573

    Noteworthy

  • State v. Reed

    Publication Date: 2019-01-15
    Practice Area: Criminal Law | Evidence
    Industry:
    Court: Appellate Division
    Judge: Per Curiam
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: A-5048-16T3

    Defendant appealed his conviction for robbery, attempted theft by threat, drug possession, witness tampering and hindering apprehension.

  • State of New Jersey v. Donell J. Anderson

    Publication Date: 2019-01-15
    Practice Area: Criminal Law | Evidence
    Industry:
    Court: Appellate Division
    Judge: Per Curiam
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: A-1798-16T2

    The appeal returned to the court from the Supreme Court with directions that the court reconsider their opinion that affirmed the denial of post-conviction relief, in light of State v. Vasco.

  • Commonwealth v. Soto

    Publication Date: 2019-01-15
    Practice Area: Criminal Law | Evidence
    Industry:
    Court: Superior Court
    Judge: Judge Nichols
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 19-0024

    Convictions for assault, disarming a police officer, and resisting arrest affirmed where police had reasonable suspicion to detain defendant for hit-and-run due to his flight from the accident scene and where evidence showed defendant attempted to take the arresting officer's taser and threw multiple punches. Judgment of sentence affirmed.

  • Commonwealth v. Baker

    Publication Date: 2019-01-15
    Practice Area: Criminal Appeals | Evidence
    Industry:
    Court: Superior Court
    Judge: Judge Shogan
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 19-0017

    The evidence at trial and the statutory language in 18 Pa.C.S. §3101 supported defendant's conviction for rape by forcible compulsion where he shot and killed the victim and then had sexual intercourse with her, as time of the victim's death was not dispositive. The appellate court affirmed defendant's judgment of sentence.