0 results for ''Tannenbaum Helpern Syracuse''
Subcontractor Had Knowledge of Delay Damages; Dismissal of Subcontract Breach Suit Denied
Appellate DivisionFirst Department
Recent Developments in Neighbor Litigation
In their Construction Law column, Kenneth M. Block and Joshua M. Levy write: Where a developer finds an uncooperative neighbor, recourse is available through Real Property Actions and Proceedings Law Section 881, pursuant to which the developer may obtain a license to enter the neighbor's property. Although 881 is silent as to the conditions for granting the license, a body of case law has developed providing guidance. This article discusses some of the more notable cases. Each case is fact specific and the foregoing discussion is intended only to provide guidance as to how a particular court would rule on a given issue.The Role of Owner's Representatives and Potential Liability
In their Construction Law column, Kenneth Block and Joshua Levy conclude that when representing a project owner, ensuring the agreement between the owner and the owner's representative contains both a properly delineated scope of authority and a comprehensive indemnity is "critical."Tribunal Disregarded the Law in Dismissing Fraudulent Inducement and Breach
Abdus-Salaam's Death Is Loss for Commercial Bar, Lawyers Say
For someone who never practiced commercial law herself, Judge Shiela Abdus-Salaam showed unusual adeptness at handling business cases throughout her career on the bench and her death is a loss to the commercial bar in New York, practitioners said.Recurring Issues with Contract Indemnities
Indemnity provisions of the contracts executed between a project owner and its contractors, architects and other professionals are critical elements in…Recurring Issues With Contract Indemnities
In their Construction Law column, Kenneth M. Block and Joshua M. Levy discuss two common misconceptions with regard to construction contract indemnities.Cite as: Jacobs v. Tannenbaum Helpern Syracuse & Hirschritt, 15cv10100, NYLJ 1202778231741, at *1 (SDNY, Decided January 30, 2017) CASENAME Albert L. Jacobs
Jacobs v. Tannenbaum Helpern Syracuse & Hirschritt
Age Not 'But-For' Cause, Religion Not Motive For Law Firm's Allegedly Discriminatory ActsCorporate Transparency Act Resource Kit
Brought to you by Wolters Kluwer
Download Now
Revenue, Profit, Cash: Managing Law Firms for Success
Brought to you by Juris Ledger
Download Now
Law Firm Operational Considerations for the Corporate Transparency Act
Brought to you by Wolters Kluwer
Download Now
The Ultimate Guide to Remote Legal Work
Brought to you by Filevine
Download Now