Sign in to follow
Search Results

0 results for ''Swartz Campbell''

You can use to get even better search results
May 28, 2020 | The Legal Intelligencer

The Legal Intelligencer Announces 2020 Professional Excellence Award Winners

The Legal Intelligencer is pleased to announce the 2020 Professional Excellence Award winners. We are delighted to highlight the great work and achievements across the full breadth of the Pennsylvania legal community.
5 minute read
In re: Asbestos Litig.
Publication Date: 2020-04-08
Practice Area: Products Liability
Industry: Chemicals and Materials
Court: Delaware Supreme Court
Judge: Justice Valihura
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Adam Balick and Patrick J. Smith, Balick & Balick, LLC, Wilmington, DE; Bartholomew J. Dalton, Ipek K. Medford, Andrew C. Dalton, Michael C. Dalton, Dalton & Associates, P.A., Wilmington, DE for plaintiffs.
For defendant: Loreto P. Rufo, Rufo Associates, PA, Hockessin, DE; John V. Work, Law Office of John V. Work, Wilmington, DE; Joseph S. Naylor, Swartz Campbell, LLC, Wilmington, DE; Paul A. Bradley and Stephanie A. Fox, Maron Marvel Bradley Anderson & Tardy, LLC, Wilmington, DE; Brian D. Tome, Reilly McDevitt & Henrich, Wilmington, DE; John C. Phillips and David A. Bilson, Phillips Goldman McLaughlin & Hall, P.A., Wilmington, DE; Christian J. Singewald and Rochelle Gumapac, White and Williams LLP, Wilmington, DE; Kelly A. Costello, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP, Wilmington, DE; Timothy A. Sullivan III, Wilbraham, Lawler & Buba PC, Wilmington, DE for defendants.
Case number: D68936

Motion to extend trial date denied where plaintiffs failed to meet good cause standard after failing to develop factual record required by Texas asbestos law after two extensions to trial date.

March 27, 2020 | The Legal Intelligencer

Legal Malpractice and COVID-19: The Devil Is in the Details and Follow the Money

The crisis will not last forever and when it subsides, we will return to our offices and to our normal work routines. COVID-19, however, will leave its mark.
5 minute read
March 17, 2020 | The Legal Intelligencer

US Judge Reinstates Defamation Claims Against 'Spotlight' Attorney Mitchell Garabedian

U.S. District Judge Jan DuBois said the allegation that Garabedian did not plan to actually file suit against a man who was accused of sexual abuse opened up a question of fact as to whether judicial immunity should apply in the case.
4 minute read
February 10, 2020 | The Legal Intelligencer

As Pennsylvania Law Firms Went National, Here's What Happened at Home

Locally founded firms still dominate Pennsylvania, but that may change as large firms everywhere seek a stronger national presence.
14 minute read
DeSantis v. Gardiner
Publication Date: 2020-01-29
Practice Area: Motor Vehicle Torts
Industry:
Court: Delaware Superior Court
Judge: Judge Carpenter
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Kenneth M. Roseman, Kenneth Roseman, P.A., Wilmington, DE for plaintiff.
For defendant: Nicholas E. Skiles, Swartz Campbell LLC, Wilmington, DE for defendant.
Case number: D68857

Defendant was not entitled to a new trial because jury members could not testify as to matters intrinsic to their deliberations.

January 15, 2020 | The Legal Intelligencer

D-Board Aims to Make Public Reprimands More Public by Bringing Them to Courtroom

"People would look at it and say it just doesn't look like it's very meaningful to do it the way we're doing it," said board chairman Andrew Trevelise. "It is serious, so we decided to do it this way."
4 minute read
January 02, 2020 | The Legal Intelligencer

Pa. Justices to Tackle Venue Rules for Internet Defamation Cases

The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has agreed to take up a case that poses a potential conundrum: How do you determine the proper venue for a defamation claim over information that was published only on the internet?
5 minute read
November 22, 2019 | The Legal Intelligencer

Judicial, Judicious, Judgmental—Misconduct Makes Headlines

Judicial misconduct has been at the forefront of the news recently. On Nov. 12, three Indiana circuit court judges were suspended without pay for 30 to 60 days for their part in an early morning brawl that resulted in two of the judges being shot.
6 minute read
September 20, 2019 | The Legal Intelligencer

Statute of Limitations in Legal Malpractice Actions

In the unpublished decision, 'Clark v. Stover,' a unanimous panel of the Pennsylvania Superior Court recently reaffirmed some of the core principles regarding the statute of limitations in legal malpractice cases.
6 minute read

TRENDING STORIES

    More from ALM

    More from ALM

    Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.

    Resources