Sign in to follow
Search Results

0 results for ''Nichols Kaster''

You can use to get even better search results
Casey v. Citibank, 5:12-CV-820
Publication Date: 2013-01-04
Practice Area: Banking
Industry:
Court: U. S. District Court, Northern District
Judge: District Judge David Hurd
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Attorneys for Plaintiffs: Donald H. Nichols, Esq., E. Michelle Drake, Esq., Kai H. Richter, Esq., Of Counsel, Nichols Kaster, PLLP, Minneapolis, MN. Matthew C. Helland, Esq., Of Counsel, One Embarcadero Center, San Francisco, CA. Attorneys for Plaintiffs: Patrick F. Madden, Esq., Sarah R. Schalman-Bergen, Esq., Shanon J. Carson, Esq., of Counsel, Berger & Montague, P.C., Philadelphia, PA.
For defendant: Attorneys for Defendants Citibank, N.A.; CitiMortgage, Inc.; and Citigroup, Inc.: Christopher J. Willis, Esq., Sarah T. Reise, Esq., Stefanie H. Jackman, Esq., Of Counsel, Ballard Spahr, LLP, Atlanta, GA. Attorneys for Defendants Citibank, N.A.; CitiMortgage, Inc.; and Citigroup, Inc.: Mitchell J. Katz, Esq., Teresa M. Bennett, Esq., Of Counsel, Menter, Rudin & Trivelpiece, P.C., Syracuse, NY. Attorneys for Defendants MidFirst Bank, N.A. and FirstInsure, Inc.: David S. Kantrowitz, Esq., John C. Englander, Esq., Matthew G. Lindenbaum, Esq., of Counsel, Goodwin Procter LLP, Boston, MA. Attorneys for Defendants MidFirst Bank, N.A. and FirstInsure, Inc.: Edward G. Melvin, Esq., Robert J. Smith, Esq., of Counsel, Costello, Cooney & Fearon, PLLC, Syracuse, NY.
Case number: 5:12-CV-820

Cite as: Casey v. Citibank, 5:12-CV-820, NYLJ 1202583126326, at *1 (NDNY, Decided ry 2, 2013)District Judge David HurdDecided:

March 23, 2011 |

Baristas' suit against Starbucks over tips may proceed as class action in Mass. federal court

A Boston federal judge has certified a Massachusetts class action against Starbucks Corp. over its tip policy on the same day plaintiffs appealed a New York federal court's judgment on the same policy to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2d Circuit.A March 18 order by District Judge Nathaniel Gorton in Matamoros v. Starbucks Corp.
4 minute read
July 14, 2010 |

In-House Lawyer Loses Whistleblower Case in Minnesota

When Sybaritic general counsel Brian Kidwell pointed out suspected illegal activity, he knew it could come back to bite him. Kidwell hit the books and tried to protect himself — but was still denied whistleblower protection.
8 minute read
May 24, 2001 |

IKON Loses Bid to Enjoin Competitor, Former Employees

A federal court held that a five-year non-compete agreement with owners of an acquired copier services company was unreasonable, finding that the contract should terminate in June of this year rather than in 2003. The court also ruled that a non-compete agreement which precluded another former employee from competing within 75 miles of his employment at IKON for a period of one year was unenforceable.
2 minute read
October 16, 2009 |

Full 7th Circuit Leaves Verbal Complaints at Employee's Own Risk

The 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on Thursday declined to hear a workplace retaliation case en banc, letting stand the panel's decision that the Fair Labor Standards Act doesn't protect "unwritten purely verbal complaints." But three judges dissented. Judges Ilana Rovner, Ann Williams and Diane Wood said their colleagues were wrong not to hear the case because the decision departs from other circuits' decisions and "the long-standing view of the Department of Labor."
2 minute read
March 25, 2010 |

High Court to Decide Whether Anti-Retaliation Shield Protects Only Those Who Complain in Writing

The Supreme Court has agreed to hear a retaliation lawsuit that seeks to answer a seemingly simple question: What does it mean to "file a complaint"? The question lies at the heart of the case of a Wisconsin factory worker who claimed he was unlawfully fired after verbally complaining to his bosses about the placement of time clocks. The employer argued that only written complaints -- not oral ones -- are protected activity under the anti-retaliation provision of the Fair Labor Standards Act, and the 7th Circuit agreed.
2 minute read
Another Wal-Mart Sex Bias Class Action Bites the Dust
Publication Date: 2013-05-29
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court:
Judge:
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number:

Wal-Mart's lawyers at Gibson Dunn are continuing to whittle away at the spin-off class actions filed in the wake of the Supreme Court's Dukes decision, though the Wisconsin judge who threw out the latest case didn't side with the mega-retailer on every issue.

June 08, 2009 |

Strippers sue to be classified as employees, not independent contractors

When it comes to wage-and-hour laws, strippers are no different from pizza delivery drivers or waitresses. That's what plaintiffs' attorney E. Michelle Drake claims in a wage-and-hour class action recently filed against a strip club in suburban Minneapolis. The suit claims that the strip club is violating state and federal wage-and-hour laws by intentionally misclassifying entertainers as independent contractors and requiring a fee — between $20 and $100 a night — to "pay for the pole."
3 minute read
Mortgage Industry Trade Association Sues Labor Department to Reverse Policy on Overtime for Loan Officers
Publication Date: 2011-01-13
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court:
Judge:
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number:

Despite the crackdown in recent years on mortgage lending, loan officers are apparently still working long hours. That's why the industry is so exercised about a 2010 change in Labor Department policy that says mortgage loan officers are entitled to overtime.

TRENDING STORIES

    More from ALM

    More from ALM

    Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.

    Resources