0 results for ''Irell & Manella''
Announcing the Winners and Finalists for the California Legal Awards
The Recorder is proud to announce this year's winners and finalists for the California Leaders in Tech Law and Innovation Awards, celebrating the achievements of lawyers and companies leading technology, innovation and the profession as a whole.Finalists Announced for The National Law Journal Legal Awards 2022
We are pleased to unveil the finalists and honorees for The National Law Journal Legal Awards highlighting the top litigation and appellate work from the past year.How a Shadowy LLC Tried to Play Both Sides of a $2.18 Billion Patent Verdict
Five takeaways from the maneuverings of OpenSky, Patent Quality Assurance, Intel and VLSI Technology in the attempt to take down a massive patent infringement verdict.View more book results for the query "'Irell & Manella'"
History Makers and Innovators: The American Lawyer Industry Awards Finalists Announced
Dr. Clarence B. Jones, who served as personal counsel to Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., and Rep. Jamie Raskin are among the inspirational crop of leaders, civil rights pioneers, innovators and client champions who will be part of the industry's biggest awards night of the year.Most Contentious Issue: Tillis Takes Another Stab at Rewriting Patent Eligibility Law
A former PTO director and a former Federal Circuit judge hailed the legislation as providing clarity and predictability in a contentions area of law. An attorney for a tech industry trade group warned that, as written, the bill would roll back advances against abusive patent litigation.$4 Billion With a B—Judge Connolly Trims VLSI Technology's Damages Ask Against Intel
In an apparent first-impression ruling, Delaware's chief federal judge ruled that patent owners cannot assign greater value to dependent claims than to independent claims.Skadden to Defend McDonald's Ice Cream Machine Maker in Lanham Act Suit
This suit was surfaced by Law.com Radar. Read the complaint here.Big Names Brandished in Effort to Restore $1.2B Cancer Treatment Verdict
The Federal Circuit ruled that a patent on a CAR-T treatment did not meet patent law's written description requirement. Jones Day and Irell & Manella are arguing for Bristol-Myers Squibb that the Federal Circuit has added judicial requirements to the statute that are virtually impossible for life sciences companies to meet.Corporate Transparency Act Resource Kit
Brought to you by Wolters Kluwer
Download Now
Revenue, Profit, Cash: Managing Law Firms for Success
Brought to you by Juris Ledger
Download Now
Law Firm Operational Considerations for the Corporate Transparency Act
Brought to you by Wolters Kluwer
Download Now
The Ultimate Guide to Remote Legal Work
Brought to you by Filevine
Download Now