0 results for ''Cowan Liebowitz Latman''
Breach, Legal Malpractice Claims Rejected by Court
Judge Lorna Schofield ruled that both statute of limitations and insufficient evidence were "independent grounds" for granting summary judgment dismissal of claims against Cowan, Liebowitz & Latman brought by a former employee.
'Edible' Trademark Infringement Case Settled
A trademark dispute between Wallingford-based Edible Arrangements and a New Hampshire-based company using "Edible" in its name has been settled.
IN BRIEF: Drinker Enters Dallas as Sedgwick Sheds 40 in Texas, NJ
San Francisco-based Sedgwick is grappling with significant departures in two major markets last week, as 15 partners and 25 additional lawyers split from the firm in the New York region and Texas. Plus more in this week's column.
Use of 'Edible' Sparks Foodie Trademark Spat
Edible Arrangements is seeking damages and an injunction barring registration of a trademark belonging to Edible Commerce Consulting.
Estate of Antin, 2002-0111
Publication Date: 2016-12-30 Practice Area: Trusts and Estates
Industry: Court: Surrogate's Court, New York County Judge: Surrogate Nora Anderson Attorneys: For plaintiff: For defendant: Case number: 2002-0111
Cite as: Estate of Antin, 2002-0111, NYLJ 1202775607472, at *1 (Surr., NY, Decided December 15, 2016) CASENAME Proceeding by Cowan, Liebowitz & Latman, P.
Trademark Claim Sticks in Fight Over Evergreen Car Fresheners
The maker of evergreen-shaped car air fresheners can pursue its trademark claim against a Kansas-based not-for-profit that is accused of marketing a rival deodorizer under a nearly identical mark, a New York federal judge has ruled.
Edible Arrangements, 1-800-Flowers Settle Dueling Lawsuits
Edible Arrangements and 1-800-Flowers, competitors in the fruit bouquet market, have agreed to settle their federal lawsuits against one another.
Wittels v. Sanford, 652479/14
Publication Date: 2016-03-29 Practice Area:
Industry: Court: Appellate Division, First Department Judge: Before: Mazzarelli, J.P., Manzanet-Daniels, Kapnick, Webber, JJ. Attorneys: For plaintiff: For Appellants: James M. Catterson of counsel, Kaye Scholer LLP, New York. For defendant: For Respondent: J. Christopher Jensen of counsel, Cowan, Liebowitz & Latman, P.C., New York. Case number: 652479/14
Cite as: Wittels v. Sanford, 652479/14, NYLJ 1202753315978, at *1 (App. Div., 1st, Decided March 24, 2016)CASE NAMESteven L. Wittels, Petitioner-Respondent v.
Ex-Partner's $5 Million Award From Former Firm Is Upheld
A $5 million arbitration award to a partner denied his 40 percent share of the partnership's value when his former law firm dissolved and reformed without him has been affirmed by an appellate court.TRENDING STORIES
More from ALM
- Holwell Shuster & Goldberg Partners Leverage 'Hostile' Witnesses to Secure $101 Million Verdict Against Walmart 1 minute read
- Legal Speak at General Counsel Conference Midwest 2024: Mike Andolina, Partner, White & Case 1 minute read
- Legal Speak at General Counsel Conference Midwest 2024: Carolyn Burbrink, Uber Director of Volume Mobility Safety and Insurance Litigation 1 minute read
Resources
A Buyer's Guide to Law Firm Software
Brought to you by PracticePanther
Download Now
A Step-by-Step Flight Plan for Legal Teams: Fire Up Your Productivity Engine and Deliver High-Impact Work Faster
Brought to you by HaystackID
Download Now
Corporate Transparency Act Resource Kit
Brought to you by Wolters Kluwer
Download Now
Revenue, Profit, Cash: Managing Law Firms for Success
Brought to you by Juris Ledger
Download Now