Sign in to follow
Search Results

0 results for ''Belkin Burden Wenig''

You can use to get even better search results
July 29, 2013 |

Court Faults DHCR for Mid-Litigation Change in Policy

Justice Dianne Renwick wrote for the unanimous panel that it "defies logic and common sense" for the DHCR to have allowed an MCI rent increase for the majority of apartments in a building, excepting only those that were damaged by the renovations, and "then render an opposite conclusion when conditions actually improve."
3 minute read
In the Matter of the Application of SP 141 E 33 LLC, Petitioner v. New York State Division of Housing and Community Renewal, Respondents, 111227/10
Publication Date: 2011-01-04
Practice Area: Landlord/Tenant Law
Industry:
Court: Supreme Court, New York County, Part 14
Judge: Judge Anil C. Singh
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Phillip L. Billet, Esquire (counsel for petitioner), Belkin Burden Wenig & Goldman, New York, NY
For defendant: Sandra A. Joseph, of counsel (counsel for respondent DHCR), DHCR, New York, NY
Case number: 111227/10

Cite as: Matter of SP 141 E 33 LLC v. New York State Division of Housing, 111227/10, NYLJ 1202476992985, at *1 (Sup., NY, Decided December 23, 2010)Judge Anil C

Matter of Nur Ashki Jerrahi Community v. New York City Loft Bd., 108599/08
Publication Date: 2010-12-06
Practice Area: Landlord/Tenant Law
Industry:
Court: Appellate Division, First Department
Judge: Before: Richard T. Andrias, J.P.; David B. Saxe, John W. Sweeny, Jr., Eugene Nardelli, James M. Catterson, JJ.
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Michael A. Cardozo, Corporation Counsel, New York (Jane L. Gordon, Edward F.X. Hart and Kristin M. Helmers of counsel), for appellant-respondent.
For defendant: Belkin Burden Wenig & Goldman, LLP, New York (Joseph Burden, Robert A. Jacobs, Sherwin Belkin and Magda L. Cruz of counsel), for Nur Ashki Jerrahi Community, respondent-appellant. Simon, Eisenberg & Baum, LLP, New York (Sheldon Karasik and Harry J. Gaffney of counsel), for Patricia Thornley, respondent-appellant.
Case number: 108599/08

Cite as: Matter of Nur Ashki Jerrahi Community v. New York City Loft Bd., 108599/08, NYLJ 1202475714108, at *1 (App. Div. 1st, Decided November 30, 2010)Before:

January 30, 2009 |

Lawyers' Moods Reflect the State of the Economy

6 minute read
Matter of Nur Ashki Jerrahi Community v. New York City Loft Bd., 108599/08
Publication Date: 2010-12-06
Practice Area: Landlord/Tenant Law
Industry:
Court: Appellate Division, First Department
Judge: Before: Richard T. Andrias, J.P.; David B. Saxe, John W. Sweeny, Jr., Eugene Nardelli, James M. Catterson, JJ.
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Michael A. Cardozo, Corporation Counsel, New York (Jane L. Gordon, Edward F.X. Hart and Kristin M. Helmers of counsel), for appellant-respondent.
For defendant: Belkin Burden Wenig & Goldman, LLP, New York (Joseph Burden, Robert A. Jacobs, Sherwin Belkin and Magda L. Cruz of counsel), for Nur Ashki Jerrahi Community, respondent-appellant. Simon, Eisenberg & Baum, LLP, New York (Sheldon Karasik and Harry J. Gaffney of counsel), for Patricia Thornley, respondent-appellant.
Case number: 108599/08

Cite as: Matter of Nur Ashki Jerrahi Community v. New York City Loft Bd., 108599/08, NYLJ 1202475714108, at *1 (App. Div. 1st, Decided November 30, 2010)Before:

April 06, 2007 |

'Illusory Tenancy' Held to Bar Eviction

3 minute read
In the Matter of the Application of 37 West Realty Company, Petitioner v. New York City Loft Board, Respondents, 400969/09
Publication Date: 2010-09-15
Practice Area: Civil Practice
Industry:
Court: Supreme Court, New York County, Part 21
Judge: Justice Michael D. Stallman
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: For Petitioner: Robert A. Jacobs, Esq., Belkin Burden Wenig & Goldman, LLP, New York, NY
For defendant: For the New York City Loft Board: Michael A. Cardozo, Corporation Counsel of the City of New York, By: Melanie V. Sadok, Esq., New York, NY For respondents-tenants: Robert Petrucci, Esq., New York, NY *1
Case number: 400969/09

Cite as: 37 West Realty Co v. New York City Loft Board, 400969/09, NYLJ 1202471963137, at *1 (Sup., NY, Decided September 02, 2010)Justice Michael D. Stallman/

Alec Merber and Stacie G. Fenster—Plaintiffs v. 37 West 72nd Street, Inc.—Defendant, 116217/07
Publication Date: 2010-08-09
Practice Area: Landlord/Tenant Law
Industry:
Court: Supreme Court, New York County, IAS PART 36
Judge: Justice Doris Ling-Cohan
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Plaintiff: Hartman, Ule, Rose & Ratner, LLP, New York, NY
For defendant: Defendant: Belkin, Burden, Wenig & Goldman, LLP, New York, NY
Case number: 116217/07

Cite as: Merber v. 37 West 72nd Street, Inc, 116217/07, NYLJ 1202464282151, at *1 (SUP, NY, Decided July 09, 2010)Ju

1256-60 Lexco LLC, Petitioner v. 1260 Lexington Corp. d/b/a Chirping Chicken, Respondent (Occupant), L&T 74383/10
Publication Date: 2010-11-03
Practice Area: Landlord/Tenant Law
Industry:
Court: Civil Court, New York Court, Part 52/75
Judge: Judge Arlene P. Bluth
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: For petitioner: Belkin Burden Wenig & Goldman, New York, NY
For defendant: For respondent: Jose Muniz, Esq., New York, NY
Case number: L&T 74383/10

Cite as: 1256-60 Lexco LLC v. 1260 Lexington Corp., L&T 74383/10, NYLJ 1202474236863, at *1 (Civ., NY, Decided October 20, 2010)Judge Arlene P. Bluthp

January 21, 2009 |

Realty Law Digest

Scott E. Mollen, a partner at Herrick, Feinstein and an adjunct professor at St. John's University School of Law, analyzes a recent Court of Appeals ruling upholding counsel's right to cancel a real estate purchase contract for any reason during the approval period.
13 minute read

TRENDING STORIES

    More from ALM

    More from ALM

    Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.

    Resources