Justice Dianne Renwick wrote for the unanimous panel that it "defies logic and common sense" for the DHCR to have allowed an MCI rent increase for the majority of apartments in a building, excepting only those that were damaged by the renovations, and "then render an opposite conclusion when conditions actually improve."
July 29, 2013 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The division of Housing and Community Renewal improperly changed a policy relating to rent increases for building renovations in the middle of a case, a state appellate panel has ruled.
Justice Dianne Renwick (See Profile) wrote the opinion for the unanimous Appellate Division, First Department, panel in 20 Fifth Avenue v. DHCR, 109920/11. The opinion, handed down July 23, was joined by Justices Peter Tom (See Profile), Richard Andrias (See Profile) and Leland DeGrasse (See Profile).
Presented by BigVoodoo
The New York Law Journal honors attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession in New York.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Truly exceptional Bergen County New Jersey Law Firm is growing and seeks strong plaintiff's personal injury Attorney with 5-7 years plaintif...
Shipman is seeking an associate to join our Labor & Employment practice in our Hartford, New Haven, or Stamford office. Candidates shou...
Evergreen Trading is a media investment firm headquartered in NYC. We help brands achieve their goals by leveraging their unwanted assets to...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
