Search Results

0 results for 'Nossaman'

You can use to get even better search results
Long-Running LCD Class Antitrust Litigation Winds Down, with $1.1 Billion in Sight
Publication Date: 2012-07-13
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court:
Judge:
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number:

This billion-dollar recovery for indirect purchasers of LCD panels, if approved by San Francisco U.S. District Judge Susan Illston, will likely lead to some big fees for the plaintiffs lawyers. In a separate case brought by different counsel on behalf of direct purchasers, Illston approved a 30 percent fee, for a total of $121 million.

The National Association of Home Builders v. The San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District
Publication Date: 2010-12-07
Practice Area: Environmental Law
Industry:
Court: 9th Cir.
Judge: Lawrence J. O'Neill, District Judge, Presiding Argued December 11, 2009 Submitted December 7, 2010 San Francisco, California Before: Betty B. Fletcher, Sidney R. Thomas, and N. Randy Smith, Circuit Judges.
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Duane J. Desiderio, Washington, DC, Robert C. Horton and Paul S. Weiland, Nossaman LLP, Irvine, California, for plaintiff-appellant The National Association of Home Builders.
For defendant: Philip M. Jay and Catherine T. Redmond, San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District, Fresno, California, for defendant-appellee The San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District and the Governing Board of the San Joaquin Unified Air Pollution Control District. Paul Cort and Gregory Cahill Loarie, Earthjustice, Oakland, California, for defendant-intervenor-appellee Environmental Defense and Sierra Club. Lisa Trankley, Office of the Attorney General, Sacramento, California, for amicus curiae State of California. Peter McVeigh, U.S. Department of Justice Environment and Natural Resources Division, Washington, DC, for amicus curiae Environmental Protection Agency.
Case number: No. 08-17309

Cite as 10 C.D.O.S. 15134THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF HOME BUILDERS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. THE SAN JOAQUIN VAL

July 31, 2008 |

Associates Survey 2008

To find out how Midlevel associates rate their firms as workplaces, our annual midlevel survey examined 12 areas that contribute to job satisfaction. They include relations with partners and other associates, the interest and satisfaction level asso-ciates have in their work, training and guidance, policy on billables, management openness about firm strategies and partnership chances, the firm?s attitude toward pro bono work, compensation and benefits, and the respondents? inclination to stay at their firm for at least two more years. Respondents graded their firms on a scale of 1 to 5, with 5 being the highest score. On this chart, firms with ten or more responses are ranked by their averages on those questions. Averages include responses from all participating of-fices. For definitions of national and international firms, and for other details, see our methodology
20 minute read
December 11, 2006 |

On the Move

A weekly report of lawyer moves and law firm changes. Keep abreast of where movers and shakers are going and what they're doing. No Subscription Required
4 minute read
July 31, 2008 |

Associates Survey 2008

Smaller firms often outscore larger ones on our annual survey of midlevel job satisfaction. It may be because a more intimate atmosphere breeds happiness. Maybe it's because associates have more responsibility. Perhaps it's because they have a better chance of making partner. In these charts, firms are grouped roughly according to size. In the first category are firms whose annual gross revenues are too low to qualify for the Am Law 200. These are the smallest firms that took part in our survey. In the second category are Am Law Second Hundred firms?numbers 101-200 on the most recent Am Law 200 survey (July.) In the final category are firms that appear on our most recent Am Law 100 (May) or Global 100 (October 2007) survey. For a full methodology, click here.
16 minute read
November 19, 2007 |

The Firm Reports

67 minute read
May 24, 2010 |

K Street Monitor

3 minute read
Congratulations! If You've Purchased a TV, Computer, or Laptop, You're Probably Now a Member of the Ginormous (and Newly Certified) LCD Antitrust Class
Publication Date: 2010-03-29
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court:
Judge:
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number:

Yes, it's true. We are all plaintiffs now. Or nearly all of us, thanks to a pair of March 28 orders certifying two classes in the consolidated antitrust litigation against the makers of liquid crystal display screens.

February 03, 2005 |

Unlikely Legal Duo Fights for Freer-Flowing Wine Market

They call themselves "the last-minute babes of Stanford Law." Last term, there was Jenny Martinez, arguing the landmark enemy combatant case Rumsfeld v. Padilla, with less than a week's notice. And in one of this term's biggest cases, former Stanford Dean Kathleen Sullivan argued in December for the interstate shipment of wines to consumers, beating out former Solicitor General Kenneth Starr for the case.
6 minute read
September 12, 2002 |

The Power Puzzle

Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe knows politics. The firm deftly uses personal connections and political money to cement its ties to local government clients. Campaign funding is one piece of the puzzle, but just as important are the longstanding relationships Orrick has developed with public officials -- relationships that have helped it dominate public finance work in California and market itself to government clients nationwide.
10 minute read

TRENDING STORIES

    Resources

    • Corporate Transparency Act Resource Kit

      Brought to you by Wolters Kluwer

      Download Now

    • Revenue, Profit, Cash: Managing Law Firms for Success

      Brought to you by Juris Ledger

      Download Now

    • Law Firm Operational Considerations for the Corporate Transparency Act

      Brought to you by Wolters Kluwer

      Download Now

    • The Ultimate Guide to Remote Legal Work

      Brought to you by Filevine

      Download Now