Sign in to follow
Search Results

0 results for 'Herrick Feinstein'

You can use to get even better search results
September 26, 2005 |

2005 Revoked List

Notice to the bar.
317 minute read
November 22, 2004 |

Successful Bar Candidates

Notice to the bar.
54 minute read
September 20, 2006 |

Peters, petitioner-respondent v. Sotheby�s Inc., respondent-appellant

Delay in Asserting Ownership Upsets Claim For Edvard Munch Painting Sold at Auction
17 minute read
August 27, 1999 |

Fired Gordon Altman Partners Win Round

Two partners forced out of New York's Gordon Altman Butowsky Weitzen Shalov & Wein last month won a small victory last week in Manhattan Supreme Court, allowing them to stay in their offices two months longer than the firm wanted.
9 minute read
August 30, 2001 |

Top New York Lawyers Share Their War Stories

Everyone loves a good war story, and lawyers are no exception. The New York Law Journal asked some of New York's top lawyers to share their most embarrassing, absurd, poignant or simply memorable experiences of their many years of practice. These tales include both the ridiculous mistakes of junior lawyers and the courtroom surprises of seasoned lawyers. Keep in mind: The attorneys profiled here survived. So will you.
15 minute read
November 22, 2004 |

Newsbriefs

3 minute read
August 05, 2010 |

New Jersey Lawyers' Fund for Client Protection v. Stewart Title Guaranty Co.

The title insurance company is not liable for an attorney's theft of his clients' funds when there was no agency relationship between the company and the attorney at the time of the theft.
5 minute read
August 19, 2009 |

Marketplace

Engineering firm Syska Hennessy has signed a 15-year lease for two floors at 1515 Broadway for its U.S. headquarters, relocating from comparably-sized space at 11 W. 42nd St. Also, United Kingdom-based GDS Publishing has signed a new seven-year lease at 40 Wall St. and Franco Apparel has signed a new lease for the entire 30th floor at 1407 Broadway.
4 minute read
October 11, 2004 |

Island Mortgages of New Jersey v. 3M

In this action alleging unconscionable commercial practices in violation of the Consumer Fraud Act, plaintiffs have failed to allege facts that would satisfy the requirement that such a claim demonstrate a capacity to mislead; even if they had alleged a viable CFA claim, they lack standing to proceed since the alleged conduct clearly falls under New Jersey's Antitrust Act, under which they would not have standing, and allowing them to go forward would undermine the standing requirements of that Act.
6 minute read
January 13, 2003 |

On the Move

2 minute read

TRENDING STORIES

    More from ALM

    More from ALM

    Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.

    Resources