0 results for 'Allstate'
Allstate Offered $16K. Here's How a Lawyer Got a $300K Settlement
"Fees continue accruing through entry of judgment," said plaintiff attorney Brendan Flanagan. "Allstate knew a pending 9-11-68 motion was incoming, and additional pre-judgment interest under 51-12-14. They agreed to settle all claims for $300,000."
Connecticut Movers: Recent Hartford-Area Hires and Promotions
Recent announcements from Carlton Fields, Cummings & Lockwood, the Connecticut Trial Firm and Murtha Cullina.
Pollution Exclusion 101: An Introduction
This article is an updated discussion of the pollution exclusion in the CGL form, referencing some court cases pertaining to the exclusion.
Judge Finds 'The Man Behind the Curtain' in Louisiana Insurance Disputes
A judge from the Eastern District of Louisiana has dismissed a case where the plaintiff's attorney didn't actually have an agreement with the plaintiff when the suit was filed.
Law Journal Press | Digital Book
New York Attorney Discipline: Practice and Procedure 2024
Authors: Hal R. Lieberman, J. Richard Supple, Jr., Harvey Prager
View this Book
View more book results for the query "Allstate"
Bogus Lawsuits? Judges Penalize Law Firm Over Hundreds of Insurance Cases
Monson showed an alleged pattern of the law firm McClenny, Moseley & Associates in Houston of preparing hundreds of hurricane damage claims based on alleged unethical practices.Regan Heating & Air Conditioning v. Arbella Prot. Ins. Co.
The Supreme Court of Rhode Island faced the question of whether the definition of "pollutant" in a CGL policy was ambiguous.Hiscox Dedicated Corp. Member, Ltd. v. Taylor
The judges of the Eighth Circuit ruled that an applicant's allegedly misleading statement was not so because the question posed was ambiguous.
Insurance Application's Foreclosure Question Is Ambiguous
In a dispute over alleged material misrepresentations in a homeowners insurance application, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit recently examined the meaning of the question whether an insurance applicant had "had a foreclosure."
Eighth Circuit: Insurance Application's Foreclosure Question Is Ambiguous
In a dispute over alleged material misrepresentations in a homeowners insurance application, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit recently examined the meaning of the question whether an insurance applicant had "had a foreclosure." The court held that question to be ambiguous and construed it against the insurer.More from ALM
- Morgan & Morgan Class Action Attorneys Detail Pathway to Success Within Cybersecurity and Data Privacy Practice 1 minute read
- Holwell Shuster & Goldberg Partners Leverage 'Hostile' Witnesses to Secure $101 Million Verdict Against Walmart 1 minute read
- Legal Speak at General Counsel Conference Midwest 2024: Mike Andolina, Partner, White & Case 1 minute read
Resources
Good Legal Technology is Good Business: A Case for Bringing Employment Issues In-House
Brought to you by LexisNexis®
Download Now
Insights and Strategies for Effective Succession Planning in AM Law 100 Firms
Brought to you by Gallagher
Download Now
State AI Legislation Is on the Move in 2024
Brought to you by LexisNexis®
Download Now
2024 ESI Risk Management & Litigation Readiness Report
Brought to you by Pagefreezer
Download Now