The “ultimate expositor” of Florida law is poised to hear oral arguments on Wednesday, as to whether an insurer, who has given notice that it will limit payments according to the statutory schedule of maximum charges, may nonetheless pay 80% of the charge submitted as a reasonable expense.

The case involves the appellee, Revival Chiropractic LLC, to whom the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida granted summary judgment adverse to the appellant, Allstate Insurance Co., on behalf of the putative class who sued under the Sunshine State’s personal injury protection statute.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]