0 results for 'Kellogg'
AT&T, Race Bosses Argue Over Cingular Logo in Federal Court Hearing
For years, NASCAR's Jeff Burton has driven the bright orange No. 31 car with the logo of Cingular Wireless. With the merger of AT&T and BellSouth, which jointly owned Cingular, AT&T hoped to use No. 31 to market the transition of the retiring Cingular brand to AT&T. But the proposed paint job has run afoul of NASCAR's sponsorship deal with AT&T rival Sprint/Nextel. AT&T went to federal court last week to demand a preliminary injunction allowing it to replace Cingular's trademarks on No. 31 with its own.Partner Kathleen Sullivan preserved a major lower court victory for Entergy Corp., persuading the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit that federal regulations preempt moves by Vermont's legislature to close the state's only nuclear power plant.
After watching lawyers for Ventas and HCP slug it out in court for nearly three weeks, a Kentucky federal district court jury ordered HCP to fork over $101 million for interfering with Ventas's planned acquisition of a Canadian real estate investment trust.
Six years ago the HMO Kaiser sued Abbott for allegedly blocking generic drugmakers from introducing a cheaper version of Abbott's hypertension drug. After a favorable jury verdict and summary judgment ruling, Abbott seemed to be off the hook. But then the Ninth Circuit got involved.
Jon Hacker is a well-known figure at the high court, and he's now getting his first chance to argue a case before justices in the so-called "Zicam case."
Courtroom 'Magician' Outduels Morgan Stanley
Plaintiffs attorney Jack Scarola has fought countless courtroom wars, first as a prosecutor in highly publicized criminal trials and then as a litigator in high-profile civil cases. His exploits have produced some bitter enemies, but his admirers are lavish in their praise. One describes him as a "magician with words." Scarola's $850 million win in financier Ronald O. Perelman's civil fraud suit against Morgan Stanley last week has not motivated the 57-year-old grandfather to slow down, either.In a 6-5 en banc decision handed down on Friday, the Federal Circuit revived two patent infringement cases—one brought by Akamai Technologies Inc. against Limelight Networks Inc., and another by McKesson Corp. against Epic Systems Corp. More significantly, the court refined the theory of "induced infringement," ruling that inducement applies even when the steps recited in the patented method were performed by multiple parties.
Trending Stories
Unlocking the Power of Early Case Assessment Workflows
Brought to you by Integreon
Download Now
Good Legal Technology is Good Business: A Case for Bringing Employment Issues In-House
Brought to you by LexisNexis®
Download Now
Insights and Strategies for Effective Succession Planning in AM Law 100 Firms
Brought to you by Gallagher
Download Now
State AI Legislation Is on the Move in 2024
Brought to you by LexisNexis®
Download Now