0 results for 'Segal McCambridge Singer Mahoney'
Latex Glove Maker Wins Defense Verdict
A Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas jury last week returned a verdict in favor of glove manufacturers in a case brought by a nurse who claimed that she became unable to work around latex after she suffered a series of allergic reactions while on the job. Defense counsel argued that the woman was genetically predisposed to allergies and her allergies may not have been caused by latex gloves.No Preemption of Cell Phone Users' Action
Class plaintiffs' claim that AT&T Wireless and Panasonic should have told purchasers their cell phones work only on AT&T's network is not preempted by the federal regulation of the wireless industry because the government doesn't regulate the technical aspect of cellular phones' access to different networks, a Philadelphia judge has ruled.Phila. Jury Awards $25.2 Million in Asbestos Case
A Philadelphia jury has awarded $25.2 million in compensatory and punitive damages in an asbestos suit.Firms rebranding to land agribusiness clients
With Midwest law firms still suffering from the recession, many in the business of agriculture law are repositioning their existing transactional, finance, mergers and acquisitions, and litigation strengths.Panel Rules Georgia Plaintiff May Sue Drugmaker in Phila.
A Georgia man who alleges his heart attack was caused by his use of the prescription drug Adderall can keep his case in the Philadelphia Common Pleas Court because the manufacturer's employees involved in the development, testing and marketing of Adderall are based in Pennsylvania, the state Superior Court ruled last week.Cell Phone Users' Action Not Pre-empted by Federal Regulation
Class plaintiffs' claim that AT&T Wireless and Panasonic should have told purchasers their cell phones work only on AT&T's network is not pre-empted by the federal regulation of the wireless industry because the government doesn't regulate the technical "aspect" of cellular phones' access to different networks, a Philadelphia judge has ruled. AT&T and Panasonic contended that state-by-state regulation would destroy federal regulation's goals of uniformity and technological flexibility.Trending Stories
Insights and Strategies for Effective Succession Planning in AM Law 100 Firms
Brought to you by Gallagher
Download Now
State AI Legislation Is on the Move in 2024
Brought to you by LexisNexis®
Download Now
2024 ESI Risk Management & Litigation Readiness Report
Brought to you by Pagefreezer
Download Now
Creating a Culture of Compliance
Brought to you by Ironclad
Download Now