Featured Firms
Presented by BigVoodoo
Class plaintiffs' claim that AT&T Wireless and Panasonic should have told purchasers their cell phones work only on AT&T's network is not pre-empted by the federal regulation of the wireless industry because the government doesn't regulate the technical "aspect" of cellular phones' access to different networks, a Philadelphia judge has ruled. AT&T and Panasonic contended that state-by-state regulation would destroy federal regulation's goals of uniformity and technological flexibility.
November 18, 2004 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
Presented by BigVoodoo
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Consulting Magazine recognizes leaders in technology across three categories Leadership, Client Service and Innovation.
Atlanta s John Marshall Law School is seeking to hire one or more full-time, visiting Legal WritingInstructors to teach Legal Research, Anal...
Shipman is seeking an associate to join our Labor & Employment practice in our Hartford, New Haven, or Stamford office. Candidates shou...
Evergreen Trading is a media investment firm headquartered in NYC. We help brands achieve their goals by leveraging their unwanted assets to...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS