0 results for 'Morris Nichols Arsht Tunnell LLP'
Deal Watch: Cravath, Davis Polk, S&C and Simpson Among Firms Making Hay in Banner Week
Law firms advised on 10 deals over $1 billion, four of which were over $10 billion, in one of the biggest deal value weeks of 2022.Morris Nichols Del. Partner to Co-Present at 2022 ABA LLC Institute
Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell Delaware partner Tarik Haskins is scheduled to co-present at the American Bar Association (ABA) annual LLC Institute from Thursday to Friday in Tampa, Florida.Don't Blame the Government: Suit Against Moderna Survives Motion to Dismiss
Judge Mitchell Goldberg will let a patent infringement suit against Moderna over COVID-19 vaccine technology proceed in district court. But he left open the possibility that Arbutus Biopharma and Genevant Sciences could ultimately be sent to the Court of Federal Claims.Morris Nichols Welcomes Three Judicial Law Clerks
Morris Nichols Arsht & Tunnell announced that three judicial law clerks from the Superior Court of Delaware's Complex Commercial Litigation Division (CCLD) have joined the firm as attorneys: Grant E. Michl, Stephanie H. Saran Rudolph and Rachel R. Tunney.View more book results for the query "Morris Nichols Arsht Tunnell LLP"
Morris Nichols Partner to Co-Present at 2022 Delaware Trust Conference
Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell partner Todd Flubacher is scheduled to co-present at the 17th annual Delaware Trust Conference held from Wednesday to Thursday in Wilmington.Merger of Southeast-Based Sugar Refiners Survives Biden Administration's First Antitrust Suit
U.S. District Judge Maryellen Noreika found the acquisition of Imperial Sugar Co. by ex-rival U.S. Sugar Corp. doesn't violate Chapter 7 of the Clayton Act. The decision was a win for litigation teams led by Cravath, Swaine & Moore and Latham & Watkins.Merger of Sugar Refiners Survives Biden Administration's First Antitrust Suit
U.S. District Judge Maryellen Noreika found the acquisition of Imperial Sugar Co. by ex-rival U.S. Sugar Corp. doesn't violate Chapter 7 of the Clayton Act. The decision was a win for litigation teams led by Cravath, Swaine & Moore and Latham & Watkins.Blockchain Domain Owners Clash Over Trademark Infringement Claims
Unstoppable Domains Inc. claims allowing another entity to sell .wallet domains causes confusion, but Wallet Inc. hasn't budged from the stance that Unstoppable doesn't have an enforceable trademark.Trademark Infringement Claims Filed As Blockchain Companies Clash Over 'Top-Level' Domain
Unstoppable Domains Inc. claims allowing another entity to sell .wallet domains causes confusion, but Wallet Inc. hasn't budged from the stance that Unstoppable doesn't have an enforceable trademark.Trending Stories
Insights and Strategies for Effective Succession Planning in AM Law 100 Firms
Brought to you by Gallagher
Download Now
State AI Legislation Is on the Move in 2024
Brought to you by LexisNexis®
Download Now
2024 ESI Risk Management & Litigation Readiness Report
Brought to you by Pagefreezer
Download Now
Creating a Culture of Compliance
Brought to you by Ironclad
Download Now