Search Results

0 results for '3M Company'

You can use to get even better search results
February 27, 2009 |

Suits & Deals

Large settlements and verdicts in New Jersey.
5 minute read
February 24, 2012 |

Suits & Deals

Large settlements and verdicts in New Jersey.
6 minute read
August 08, 2005 |

Obstetrical Malpractice Case Settles For $8 Million in Monmouth County

Large verdicts and settlements in New Jersey.
4 minute read
February 25, 2009 |

Processor Wars Speed Into Court

Antitrust laws are the bulwark to a competitive marketplace. Where antitrust enforcement is effective, firms cannot engage in exclusionary practices in the marketplace. In the current economic downturn, antitrust becomes even more vital to economic growth and technical advancement.
8 minute read
July 24, 2009 |

Suits & Deals

Large settlements and suits in New Jersey.
6 minute read
Law Journal Press | Digital Book Representing High-Tech Companies Authors: Gary M. Lawrence, Carl Baranowski View this Book

View more book results for the query "3M Company"

October 02, 2006 |

Stay Tuned, as Federal Court Rejects Comcast's Antitrust Defenses

On Aug. 31, District Judge John R. Padova denied Comcast Corp.'s motion to dismiss a class action antitrust lawsuit that was filed against it by six of its cable television services customers in the Philadelphia and Chicago markets.
7 minute read
August 08, 2002 |

Should Lawyers Take the Stand?

Courts are more likely to bar patent experts' proposed testimony or to narrow its scope. To these courts, patent law experts are just lawyers in sheep's clothing: walking, talking legal briefs in the guise of a witness. Still, a patent law expert's testimony can be some of the most influential evidence at trial. To understand how to craft effective testimony in this area, one must first understand its limits.
7 minute read
March 24, 2003 |

Federal Circuit

The top 10 patent decisions by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit from October 2002 through January 2003.
7 minute read
B.M. v. D.M., 50333/2007
Publication Date: 2011-04-15
Practice Area: Family Law
Industry:
Court: Supreme Court, Richmond County, Part MP 11
Judge: Justice Catherine M. DiDomenico
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 50333/2007

Cite as: B.M. v. D.M., 50333/2007, NYLJ 1202489916893, at *1 (Sup. RI, Decided April 7, 2011)Justice Catherine M. DiDomenicoDecided: Apri

December 02, 2011 |

Suits & Deals

Large settlements and verdicts in New Jersey.
6 minute read

Resources

  • Good Legal Technology is Good Business: A Case for Bringing Employment Issues In-House

    Brought to you by LexisNexis®

    Download Now

  • Insights and Strategies for Effective Succession Planning in AM Law 100 Firms

    Brought to you by Gallagher

    Download Now

  • State AI Legislation Is on the Move in 2024

    Brought to you by LexisNexis®

    Download Now

  • 2024 ESI Risk Management & Litigation Readiness Report

    Brought to you by Pagefreezer

    Download Now

NEXT