Search Results

0 results for 'Caruso Law Offices'

You can use to get even better search results
January 09, 2007 |

Unpublished Opinions

Unpublished state and federal court opinions.
34 minute read
July 17, 2007 |

Technology Tracks Smoking Guns

Years ago, investigators trying to learn where a weapon came from had to browse file cabinets filled with index cards. Today, investigators have high-tech tools and databases at their disposal to determine how a weapon reached a crime scene.
4 minute read
June 14, 2004 |

State Court Rulings

$7.8 Million Med Mal Verdict in Pittsburgh Briggs v. University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Shadyside Hospital $7.8 Million Verdict Date of Verdict: June 1, 2004. Court and Case Number: C.P. Allegheny, No. GD-01-21748. Judge: W
8 minute read
March 03, 2008 |

A Prayer From Barack Obama

Douglas Kmiec contends that religious voters can faithfully support Barack Obama.
9 minute read
July 28, 2003 |

TEST: Please don't delete

Appeal from an order of the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut (Droney, J.), affirming ALJ's decision to deny plaintiff disability benefits. We reverse and remand the case, because the ALJ erred in failing to accord controlling weight to the treating physician's opinion.
23 minute read
August 22, 2005 |

Unpublished Opinions

Unpublished state and federal court opinions.
23 minute read
April 10, 2006 |

Unpublished Opinions

Unpublished state and federal court opinions.
44 minute read
June 26, 1999 |

Attorneys' Fees in a Nutshell

Under the well-settled "American Rule," litigants generally must pay their own attorneys' fees -- win or lose. One major exception to the rule arises under statutes that contain fee-shifting provisions. This article examines attorneys' fee awards to prevailing parties -- both plaintiffs and defendants -- in employment-related cases arising under anti-discrimination statutes.
29 minute read
May 02, 2007 |

11th Circuit: Public College VP's Internal Comments Not Protected Speech

A federal appellate court has held that a former Miami Dade College vice president's complaints about possible ethical issues concerning its president were not protected free speech because they were made internally and not publicly. If Adis M. Vila had made the comments to the news media or the public, they would have been protected under the First Amendment, the court said. The 11th Circuit panel's unanimous ruling April 20 relied heavily on a controversial U.S. Supreme Court ruling from last June.
7 minute read

Resources

  • Good Legal Technology is Good Business: A Case for Bringing Employment Issues In-House

    Brought to you by LexisNexis®

    Download Now

  • Insights and Strategies for Effective Succession Planning in AM Law 100 Firms

    Brought to you by Gallagher

    Download Now

  • State AI Legislation Is on the Move in 2024

    Brought to you by LexisNexis®

    Download Now

  • 2024 ESI Risk Management & Litigation Readiness Report

    Brought to you by Pagefreezer

    Download Now

NEXT