If Adis M. Vila had made the comments to the news media or the public, they would have been protected under the First Amendment, the court said.

The unanimous April 20 ruling by an 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals panel in Adis M. Vila v. Eduardo J. Padron relied heavily on a controversial U.S. Supreme Court ruling. The Supreme Court ruled in a 5-4 decision last June that the First Amendment does not prohibit managers in government agencies from disciplining employees for internal critical comments made pursuant to their official duties.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]