Sign in to follow
Search Results

0 results for ''Benesch''

You can use to get even better search results
November 21, 2007 |

National Rankings

18 minute read
In re Level Propane Gases, Inc.
Publication Date: 2010-04-06
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court: 6th Cir.
Judge: Marci B. McIVOR, Bankruptcy Appellate Panel Judge.
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 09-8047

By order of the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel, the precedential effect of this decision is limited to the case and parties pursuant to 6th Cir. BAP LBR 8013-1(b). See also 6th Cir. BAP LBR 8010-1(c).A

August 05, 2010 |

Appeal heard in case challenging university's consideration of race in admissions

In Aug. 3 arguments at the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, lawyers for two women denied admission to the University of Texas at Austin asserted that their suit challenging the constitutionality of the school's use of race in admissions should move forward.Fisher, et al. v. University of Texas at Austin, et al. has attracted national attention and 30 amici.
10 minute read
February 02, 2010 |

News In Brief

Kelly Crabb joins the entertainment group, and Richard Kopenhefer joins the labor practice.
6 minute read
February 04, 2009 |

PEOPLE IN THE NEWS

EventsAlianza, the Latino law students association at the Rutgers University School of Law-Camden, will honor attorney Carlos M. Bollar at the association's seventh annual Campeones de la Justicia (Champions of Justice) banquet.
3 minute read
July 31, 2008 |

Associates Survey 2008

To find out how Midlevel associates rate their firms as workplaces, our annual midlevel survey examined 12 areas that contribute to job satisfaction. They include relations with partners and other associates, the interest and satisfaction level asso-ciates have in their work, training and guidance, policy on billables, management openness about firm strategies and partnership chances, the firm?s attitude toward pro bono work, compensation and benefits, and the respondents? inclination to stay at their firm for at least two more years. Respondents graded their firms on a scale of 1 to 5, with 5 being the highest score. On this chart, firms with ten or more responses are ranked by their averages on those questions. Averages include responses from all participating of-fices. For definitions of national and international firms, and for other details, see our methodology
20 minute read
February 09, 2009 |

People in the News

Click the headline above to view this week's People in the News listings.
3 minute read
American Ass'n of Univ. Professors v. Central State Univ.
Publication Date: 1999-10-20
Practice Area: discrimination | labor law | retaliation
Industry:
Court: The United States Supreme Court
Judge: MOYER, C.J., PFEIFER and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., F.E. SWEENEY, J., DOUGLAS and RESNICK, JJ., COOK, J.
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Donald J. Mooney, Jr.,and Mark D. Tucker
For defendant: Betty D. Montgomery, et al.
Case number: No. 97-568

The full case caption appears at the end of this opinion. [Cite as Am. Assn. of Univ. Professors, Cent. State Univ. Chapter v. Cent. State Univ. (1999), 87 Ohio St.3

February 11, 2010 |

Kasowitz Sues Duane Reade for $7 Million 'Success Fee'

Kasowitz, Benson, Torres & Friedman has sued longtime client Duane Reade for a $7 million "success fee" it claims it is owed as part of an alternative fee arrangement. The law firm represented the drugstore chain in a contract dispute that the company settled for an estimated $39.5 million without Kasowitz's knowledge. Kasowitz claims the settlement included terms the firm negotiated during the course of the litigation. The suit comes as clients are increasingly pushing law firms to enter into non-hourly fee arrangements.
5 minute read
July 31, 2008 |

Associates Survey 2008

Smaller firms often outscore larger ones on our annual survey of midlevel job satisfaction. It may be because a more intimate atmosphere breeds happiness. Maybe it's because associates have more responsibility. Perhaps it's because they have a better chance of making partner. In these charts, firms are grouped roughly according to size. In the first category are firms whose annual gross revenues are too low to qualify for the Am Law 200. These are the smallest firms that took part in our survey. In the second category are Am Law Second Hundred firms?numbers 101-200 on the most recent Am Law 200 survey (July.) In the final category are firms that appear on our most recent Am Law 100 (May) or Global 100 (October 2007) survey. For a full methodology, click here.
16 minute read

More from ALM

More from ALM

Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.

Resources