0 results for ''Susman Godfrey''
The 2024 Am Law 100: Ranked by Gross Revenue
Fifty-four firms posted gross revenue of $1 billion or more in 2023, four more than in 2022. Ninety firms reported gains in gross revenue.Denial of Injunctive Relief Explained in Suit Over Use of SUNY RF's Intellectual Property
An Early Look: The 2024 Am Law 200 Financials
This feed is continually updated. So bookmark it, check back regularly, and stay tuned for the Am Law 100 and Second Hundred reports coming soon.Litigators of the Week: Plaintiffs Reach a $418M Market-Shifting Settlement With Realtor Group
The National Association of Realtors agreed to changes that could trim the commissions paid to agents as part of the deal reached with co-lead counsel at Ketchmark and McCreight, Boulware Law, Williams Dirks Dameron, Hagens Berman, Cohen Milstein, and Susman Godfrey.View more book results for the query "'Susman Godfrey'"
Big Law Takes Bigger Bet on Contingency Fee Practices
Kirkland, Crowell, Quinn and Susman Godfrey, among others, have all had financial gains from contingency fee cases. "We've seen a noticeable increase in interest in building out plaintiff side practices," said Evan Meyerson, at Burford Capital.Revenue, Profits Soar at Susman Godfrey as Fees Pour in From Trial Wins, Settlements
Houston-founded trial firm Susman Godfrey nearly doubled its revenue in 2023, and more than doubled profits per equity partner as lawyers handled high-stakes, high-profile matters.National Association of Realtors Reaches $418M Settlement to Resolve Antitrust Class Actions
"Probably the largest transaction that people will make is buying or selling a home, so for most Americans, being able to save a significant amount of money in connection with that transaction is really meaningful, and it's one of the reasons I wanted to work on this," Plaintiffs' attorney, Robert A. Braun of Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll, told Law.com.Lawyers Are Watching These AI-Tinged Antitrust Cases
Antitrust litigators have an eye on this emerging litigation across the country.Court declined to preliminarily enjoin invocation of drag-along rights where the invocation was not inconsistent with the terms of the proposed merger agreement or the minority securityholders' agreements and the minority could obtain monetary relief if the court ultimately found an improper invocation.
Trending Stories
Unlocking the Power of Early Case Assessment Workflows
Brought to you by Integreon
Download Now
Good Legal Technology is Good Business: A Case for Bringing Employment Issues In-House
Brought to you by LexisNexis®
Download Now
Insights and Strategies for Effective Succession Planning in AM Law 100 Firms
Brought to you by Gallagher
Download Now
State AI Legislation Is on the Move in 2024
Brought to you by LexisNexis®
Download Now