0 results for ''Meyers Nave''
Alvarez v. Superior Court (People)
Publication Date: 2010-04-09 Practice Area: Criminal Practice
Industry: Court: C.A. 1st Judge: Attorneys: For plaintiff: Jeff Adachi, Teresa Caffese, Linda Harris Colfax and Christopher F. Gauger, for Petitioner
Duane A. Danmeyer and Michael C. McMahon for California Public Defenders Association and the Public Defender of Ventura County as Amici Curiae on behalf of Petitioner
Ann C. Moorman and John T. Philipsborn for California Attorneys for Criminal Justice as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Petitioner For defendant: Meyers, Nave, Riback, Silver & Wilson and Joseph M. Quinn, for Respondent
Jarvis, Fay, Doporto & Gibson, Benjamin P. Fay and Rick W. Jarvis for Presiding Judges of the Superior Courts of Alameda, Contra Costa, and Napa Counties as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Respondent
Edmund G. Brown Jr., Attorney General, Gerald A. Engler, Senior Assistant Attorney General (Attorneys for Real Party in Interest) Case number: No. A125626
Cite as 10 C.D.O.S. 4431ALEJANDRO ALVAREZ, Petitioner, v.THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCI
In re ELECTRIC REFUND CASES.
Publication Date: 2010-05-27 Practice Area: Administrative Law
Industry: Court: C.A. 2nd Judge: Attorneys: For plaintiff: Brune & Richard, Laurie Edelstein, Randall T. Kim; Sidley Austin, Marie L. Fiala; Stephen L. Schirle and Mark Patrizio for Plaintiff and Appellant Pacific Gas and Electric Company.
Steptoe & Johnson, Lawrence P. Riff, Jay E. Smith; Russell C. Swartz and Leon Bass, Jr. for Plaintiff and Appellant Southern California Edison Company.
Hennigan Bennett & Dorman, J. Michael Hennigan, Laura Lindgren and Robert W. Mockler for Plaintiff and Appellant San Diego Gas & Electric Company. For defendant: Meyers, Nave, Riback, Silver & Wilson, Benjamin T. Reyes, II, Geoffrey Spellberg, Joseph M. Quinn; Slover & Loftus and Robert D. Rosenberg for Defendant and Appellant Arizona Electric Power Cooperative, Inc. Case number: Nos. B206881, B207189, B208946
Cite as 10 C.D.O.S. 6576In re ELECTRIC REFUND CASES. Nos. B206881, B207189 & B208946 In the Court of Appea
Mammoth Lakes Land Acquisition, LLC v. Town of Mammoth Lakes
Publication Date: 2010-12-31 Practice Area: education law and organizations
Industry: Court: C.A. 3rd Judge: Attorneys: For plaintiff: Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, Daniel L. Brockett, John M. Pierce, and Daniel H. Bromberg, for Plaintiff and Respondent. For defendant: Law Office of Peter E. Tracy and Peter E. Tracy; Morrison & Foerster, Edgar B. Washburn, Maria Chedid, Shaye Diveley, and Anton A. Ware, for Defendant and Appellant.
Meyers, Nave, Riback, Silver & Wilson, Steven R. Meyers, Julia L. Bond, and Peter S. Hayes, for League of California Cities and California State Association of Counties as Amici Curiae on behalf of Defendant and Appellant. Case number: No. C059239
Cite as 11 C.D.O.S. 56MAMMOTH LAKES LAND ACQUISITION, LLC, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. TOWN OF MAMMOTH LAKES,
Gressett v. Superior Court (People)
Publication Date: 2010-05-28 Practice Area: Criminal Practice
Industry: Court: C.A. 1st Judge: Attorneys: For plaintiff: For Petitioner: Michael J. Kotin, Esq. For defendant: For Respondent: Superior Court of Contra Costa County, Meyers, Nave, Riback, Silver & Wilson, Joseph M. Quinn, Esq.
For Real Party in Interest: The People of the State of California, Edmund G. Brown, Jr., Attorney General; Peter E. Flores, Jr., Deputy Attorney General
For Real Party in Interest: County of Contra Costa, Sharon L. Anderson, County Counsel; Rebecca J. Hooley, Deputy County Counsel Case number: No. A127100
Cite as 10 C.D.O.S. 6688MICHAEL GRESSETT, Petitioner, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, Resp
Second Opinions: Constructing Your Web Site
Thinking of revamping an existing Web site or launching an entirely new one for your firm? Before you move forward, read some advice from lawyers and tech professionals and find out how to make your site "sticky." (That's a good thing.) And one more quick tip: forget the plug-ins, OK?Justices Set to Decide the Fate of Recall Cases
California Supreme Court justices are expected today to decide whether they'll wade into the legal fight over the Oct. 7 recall of Gov. Gray Davis. For the past several days, the justices have been considering five petitions attacking the election. Although they asked for briefs -- which some took as a sign they'd take the cases -- the justices still have not officially granted review. The court announced late Wednesday they would take action on the recall cases at around noon today.Trending Stories
- 1AI: Looking at Its Impact on the Legal Profession in 2025 and Beyond
- 2Joshua Wright's $108M Defamation Case Against Former Students to Proceed to Trial
- 3The Hype Behind Harvey: How the Stealthy Startup Is Raising Industry Eyebrows
- 4'Misses the Forest for the Trees': Barrett Knocks Thomas' Use of History
- 5AI/IP Issues Part 1: State of the Law and Anticipating Issues Including Licensing Concerns
More from ALM
- Morgan & Morgan Class Action Attorneys Detail Pathway to Success Within Cybersecurity and Data Privacy Practice 1 minute read
- Holwell Shuster & Goldberg Partners Leverage 'Hostile' Witnesses to Secure $101 Million Verdict Against Walmart 1 minute read
- Legal Speak at General Counsel Conference Midwest 2024: Mike Andolina, Partner, White & Case 1 minute read
Resources
Unlocking the Power of Early Case Assessment Workflows
Brought to you by Integreon
Download Now
Good Legal Technology is Good Business: A Case for Bringing Employment Issues In-House
Brought to you by LexisNexis®
Download Now
Insights and Strategies for Effective Succession Planning in AM Law 100 Firms
Brought to you by Gallagher
Download Now
State AI Legislation Is on the Move in 2024
Brought to you by LexisNexis®
Download Now