• Balkovic v. Balkovic

    Publication Date: 2019-01-18
    Practice Area: Civil Procedure | Family Law
    Industry:
    Court: Appellate Division
    Judge: Per Curiam
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: A-3453-15T4

    In the post-judgment matrimonial matter the ex-wife defendant appealed from an order that denied her motion to reconsider or vacate a prior order.

  • Bell v. Bell

    Publication Date: 2019-01-18
    Practice Area: Civil Procedure | Family Law
    Industry:
    Court: Appellate Division
    Judge: Per Curiam
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: A-2806-16T2

    In the post-judgment matrimonial matter, the ex-husband plaintiff appealed from an order that denied reconsideration of the effective date of emancipation of the parties' youngest child; that denied reconsideration of the enforcement of the provision of the parties' property settlement agreement that entitled defendant to a lump sum payment from plaintiff's pension plan; and that denied reconsideration of the counsel fees awarded to defendant in connection with the enforcement of the pension provision.

  • F.N. v. A.S.

    Publication Date: 2019-01-17
    Practice Area: Civil Procedure | Family Law
    Industry:
    Court: Appellate Division
    Judge: Per Curiam
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: A-1885-17T3

    Defendant appealed from a portion of a final judgment of divorce that awarded the plaintiff counsel fees.

  • J.M. v. T.F.

    Publication Date: 2019-01-17
    Practice Area: Civil Procedure | Evidence | Family Law
    Industry:
    Court: Appellate Division
    Judge: Per Curiam
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: A-2621-16T4

    Defendant appealed from a final restraining order entered in favor of plaintiff pursuant to the Prevention of Domestic Violence Act of 1991.

  • C.L.H. v. T.F.H.

    Publication Date: 2019-01-11
    Practice Area: Family Law
    Industry:
    Court: Appellate Division
    Judge: Per Curiam
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: A-1827-17T1

    The defendant appealed from the Family Part judge's final restraining order entered against him in favor of his estranged wife under the Prevention of Domestic Violence Act.

  • C.C. v. M.H.

    Publication Date: 2019-01-11
    Practice Area: Family Law
    Industry:
    Court: Appellate Division
    Judge: Per Curiam
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: A-3900-16T1

    Plaintiffs appealed from the order granting defendants' motion to dismiss plaintiffs' complaint for grandparent visitation.

  • Stobbe v. Stobbe

    Publication Date: 2019-01-10
    Practice Area: Dispute Resolution | Family Law
    Industry:
    Court: Appellate Division
    Judge: Per Curiam
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: A-1542-17T2

    Divorce proceedings began between the parties with the filing of the plaintiff's complaint and the defendant's counterclaim.

  • Morel v. Morel

    Publication Date: 2019-01-10
    Practice Area: Civil Procedure | Family Law
    Industry:
    Court: Appellate Division
    Judge: Per Curiam
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: A-1633-17T4

    Plaintiff appealed the orders denying her motion to file an amended complaint and granting defendant's motion in limine in a divorce action.

  • Frangipane v Frangipane

    Publication Date: 2019-01-09
    Practice Area: Family Law
    Industry:
    Court: Appellate Division
    Judge: Per Curiam
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: A-2515-17T2

    Plaintiff appealed the termination of defendant's alimony obligation and the enforcement of her obligation to pay her portion of their daughter's college tuition.

  • H.B. v. P.S.

    Publication Date: 2019-01-09
    Practice Area: Family Law
    Industry:
    Court: Appellate Division
    Judge: Per Curiam
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: A-4873-15T1

    Defendant appealed from two post-judgment orders.