The New Jersey Supreme Court won't consider reinstating a $166 million verdict against the state in the case of an infant who was severely abused by his father after child-welfare authorities declined to remove him from the home.
October 19, 2017 at 08:00 PM
1 minute read
The New Jersey Supreme Court won’t consider reinstating a $166 million verdict against the state in the case of an infant who was severely abused by his father after child-welfare authorities declined to remove him from the home.
The jury award came in 2013 in the case of Jadiel Velesquez, who at the age of 4 months was left blind and cognitively disabled after his father violently shook him to stop him from crying.
Presented by BigVoodoo
New Jersey Law Journal honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in New Jersey with their dedication to the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Truly exceptional Bergen County New Jersey Law Firm is growing and seeks strong plaintiff's personal injury Attorney with 5-7 years plaintif...
Atlanta s John Marshall Law School is seeking to hire one or more full-time, visiting Legal WritingInstructors to teach Legal Research, Anal...
Shipman is seeking an associate to join our Labor & Employment practice in our Hartford, New Haven, or Stamford office. Candidates shou...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
