Recent court rulings on cellphone searches present a spate of diametrically opposed Fourth Amendment holdings this past year. California and Florida, for example, have issued conflicting rules for the search of cellphones seized upon arrest, with the First and Seventh Circuits interpreting the law in different ways on the federal level. Ching, “Cellphone Question Headed for Supreme Court,” The Recorder (May 30, 2013); U.S. v. Wurie, ___F.3d___, No. 11-1792 (1st Cir. May 17, 2013); U.S. v. Flores-Lopez, ___F.3d___, No. 10-3803 (7th Cir. 2012).
To view this content, please continue to Lexis Advance®.
Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber? Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via Lexis Advance®. This includes content from the National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.
ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at firstname.lastname@example.org