The state Supreme Court is considering whether the immunity conferred by the state Ski Act on slope operators covers patrons alleged to be partly responsible for skiers' injuries.
January 17, 2013 at 02:47 AM
1 minute read
The state Supreme Court is considering whether the immunity conferred by the state Ski Act on slope operators covers patrons alleged to be partly responsible for skiers’ injuries.
The court, in Angland v. Mountain Creek Resort, A-57-11, heard arguments Monday on whether a snowboarder, William Brownlee, should have to answer claims that his actions led to the death of skier Robert Angland.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Consulting Magazine recognizes leaders in technology across three categories Leadership, Client Service and Innovation.
Truly exceptional Bergen County New Jersey Law Firm is growing and seeks strong plaintiff's personal injury Attorney with 5-7 years plaintif...
Shipman is seeking an associate to join our Labor & Employment practice in our Hartford, New Haven, or Stamford office. Candidates shou...
Evergreen Trading is a media investment firm headquartered in NYC. We help brands achieve their goals by leveraging their unwanted assets to...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
