The state Supreme Court is considering whether an expert in a medical malpractice case must be certified in the same specialty as the defendant or needs only practice in a similar field.
October 12, 2012 at 01:37 AM
1 minute read
The state Supreme Court is considering whether an expert in a medical malpractice case must be certified in the same specialty as the defendant or needs only practice in a similar field.
The court heard arguments Thursday in an interlocutory appeal from a trial judge’s order that took the broader view.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Consulting Magazine recognizes leaders in technology across three categories Leadership, Client Service and Innovation.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
