In an unpublished decision issued by the Honorable Renee Marie Bumb of the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey, the court held that New Jersey’s entire controversy doctrine precluded the borrowers’ action against the lender and its servicer for their alleged improper business practices arising out of an alleged overcharge of the debt pay-off amount. The action against the lender and servicer was instituted after the lender’s foreclosure action had concluded. In a victory for mortgage lenders and servicers, the court found that such claims were barred because they should and could have been raised in the earlier foreclosure action. Napoli v. HSBC Mortg. Servs., No. 12-CV-222, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 121204 (D.N.J. Aug. 27, 2012).
To view this content, please continue to Lexis Advance®.
Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber? Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via Lexis Advance®. This includes content from the National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.
ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at email@example.com