I read with dismay the recent New Jersey Law Journal editorial entitled “Pro Bono Service Should Be Mandatory” (228 N.J.L.J. 2974, Nov. 21, 2022). Pro bono service should only be rendered voluntarily, and only in matters in which the attorney is sufficiently interested and competent to ensure that pro bono work is practically effective for the client. Competence is important in all types of attorney representation, but it is most critical where an indigent person with the inability to choose and pay for counsel faces imprisonment or other “consequences of magnitude.”

The current institutionalized Madden system of forced attorney labor ignores the specific needs of indigent clients, as well as the professional qualifications, work schedules, and personal inclinations of attorneys who are appointed to represent them. As such, it demeans and disserves all parties. “Non-exempt” attorneys are wrongly presumed to be fungible as to their qualifications and abilities, and indigent defendants are wrongly presumed to be fungible as to their needs.