Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
Derek Potts, Potts Law Firm, Houston. Derek Potts, Potts Law Firm, Houston.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit is calling in outside help in hopes of resolving a dispute about whether New Jersey or Texas contingency fee rules should apply in multidistrict litigation over transvaginal mesh devices.

The appeals court asked the New Jersey Supreme Court to provide guidance on whether New Jersey court rules apply to pelvic mesh lawsuits that were filed in a New Jersey court by lawyers from Texas.

Want to continue reading?
Become a Free ALM Digital Reader.

Benefits of a Digital Membership:

  • Free access to 1 article* every 30 days
  • Access to the entire ALM network of websites
  • Unlimited access to the ALM suite of newsletters
  • Build custom alerts on any search topic of your choosing
  • Search by a wide range of topics

*May exclude premium content
Already have an account?

Charles Toutant

Charles Toutant is a litigation writer for the New Jersey Law Journal.

More from this author

Reprints & Licensing
Mentioned in a Law.com story?

License our industry-leading legal content to extend your thought leadership and build your brand.


ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2021 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.