istock
The Appellate Division said the plaintiff's "sparse allegations" doomed his suit against Kennedys CMK and one of the firm's attorneys. The plaintiff "did not allege that the disparaging statements were made to him or in his presence, nor did he divulge how they were otherwise made known to him," the court said.
August 27, 2019 at 08:02 AM
1 minute read
The dismissal of a former Middletown lawyer’s claims that another attorney poached his clients and defamed him was affirmed by an appellate panel.
The Appellate Division ruling means plaintiff Ronald Horowitz, a freight transportation lawyer, fails in his pro se suit against Richard Furman and his firm, Kennedys CMK.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Consulting Magazine recognizes leaders in technology across three categories Leadership, Client Service and Innovation.
Atlanta s John Marshall Law School is seeking to hire one or more full-time, visiting Legal WritingInstructors to teach Legal Research, Anal...
Shipman is seeking an associate to join our Labor & Employment practice in our Hartford, New Haven, or Stamford office. Candidates shou...
Evergreen Trading is a media investment firm headquartered in NYC. We help brands achieve their goals by leveraging their unwanted assets to...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
