This story is reprinted with permission from FC&S Legal, the industry’s only comprehensive digital resource designed for insurance coverage law professionals. Visit the website to subscribe.
An appellate court in New Jersey has affirmed a trial court’s decision barring a physician’s testimony on behalf of an insured at his trial against an insurer where the insured had not identified the physician as a possible witness, notwithstanding that the physician previously conducted an independent medical examination (“IME”) of the insured on behalf of her insurer.
