"We find no evidence that the judge was hostile to plaintiff, biased or unfair," the panel said. "To the contrary, the judge appeared patient and focused in her attempts to handle a zealous attorney and a pro se defendant, both of whom persisted in interrupting each other and interrupting the judge."
November 02, 2018 at 04:57 PM
1 minute read
bureau chief
A New Jersey appeals court has ruled that a Family Part judge did not abuse her discretion when she refused to recuse from a matrimonial case based on one party’s claims of bias and hostility.
The two-judge Appellate Division panel in an unpublished decision said Union County Superior Court Judge Lisa Chrystal acted properly in denying the recusal motion, which was filed by an ex-wife in a contentious post-divorce child custody matter.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Atlanta s John Marshall Law School is seeking to hire one or more full-time, visiting Legal WritingInstructors to teach Legal Research, Anal...
Shipman is seeking an associate to join our Labor & Employment practice in our Hartford, New Haven, or Stamford office. Candidates shou...
Evergreen Trading is a media investment firm headquartered in NYC. We help brands achieve their goals by leveraging their unwanted assets to...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
