Mail and wire fraud based on the deprivation of honest services is one of the most thorny concepts in white-collar criminal law. Since prosecutors advanced and federal courts accepted this theory of liability beginning in roughly the early 1970s, defense counsel and some commentators and courts have raised concerns about the vagueness and unclear boundaries of criminal responsibility. These concerns have related chiefly to, first, uncertainty as to when disloyalty to an organization or the public as a whole turns from civil breaches of fiduciary (or similar) duties into criminal behavior, and, second, the danger that a highly expansive theory of criminal liability could be misused to target individuals in a capricious or otherwise unfair manner.
To view this content, please continue to Lexis Advance®.
Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber? Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via Lexis Advance®. This includes content from the National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.
ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at firstname.lastname@example.org