Citing a recent U.S. Supreme Court decision on copyright protection for artistic elements of everyday products, a Southern District judge has ruled that a light set’s decorative covers deserve protection because they are “sculptural works … capable of existing apart from the utilitarian aspect of the light set.”

U.S. District Judge Katherine Forrest’s decision, which focused largely on a “separability analysis” among the set’s artistic features and its intended use, denied defendant Advance International Inc.’s cross-motion for summary judgment. Advance International and related defendants had partially argued the light set couldn’t be copyrighted because it was a “useful article” containing artistic elements not sufficiently separable from its use.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]