0 results for 'undefined'
It's Time to Fix the Expungement Process
OP-ED: This broken system impedes employment, housing, participation in community affairs, and a panoply of other activities for thousands of persons with arrests on their record, many related to matters that were dismissed.
State AGs Lodge Interstate Smog Lawsuit Against US EPA
A coalition of six states, including New Jersey, and New York City has lodged a lawsuit against the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency for allegedly failing to regulate interstate smog pollution.
Joe Hynes: Remembering 60 Years of Friendship
Our long-suffering wives, Patricia and Mary, decided to sit at a separate table so they could enjoy their conversations without having to listen to the stories both had endured for well over 50 years.
Legal Football, Smog Suit, $41 Million: The Morning Minute
Here's the news you need to start your day.
With Risks Growing, Lateral Hiring Takes a Leap of Faith
The war for lateral talent is more fierce than ever, despite—or in some cases because of—the likelihood that a recession looms.
Law Journal Press | Digital Book
Pennsylvania Causes of Action, 12th Edition
Authors: GAETAN J. ALFANO, RONALD J. SHAFFER, JOSHUA C. COHAN
View this Book
View more book results for the query "*"
In the MeToo Era, Lateral Candidates Are Going Under the Microscope
The hiring process now involves an extra layer of risk—and requires an extra layer of scrutiny.
Mc Farland v. Liberty Ins. Corp.
The Idaho Supreme Court, in a big victory for homeowners, has ruled that the undefined term “dwelling” in a homeowners’ insurance policy was ambiguous and encompassed a detached garage at the insured property.Scout, Ltd. Liab. Co. v. Truck Ins. Exch.
The Idaho Supreme Court has ruled that an insured’s Facebook post precluded insurance coverage of a trademark infringement lawsuit against the insured because of the prior publication exclusion in the insurance policy.Hutchinson v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co.
A federal district court in Pennsylvania has remanded an insurance coverage case to state court after deciding that the defendant insurer should have known that the amount in controversy exceeded $75,000 from the insureds’ complaint and, therefore, that its removal months after the complaint was filed was untimely. The court’s reasoning may not be able to withstand close scrutiny.More from ALM
- Morgan & Morgan Class Action Attorneys Detail Pathway to Success Within Cybersecurity and Data Privacy Practice 1 minute read
- Holwell Shuster & Goldberg Partners Leverage 'Hostile' Witnesses to Secure $101 Million Verdict Against Walmart 1 minute read
- Legal Speak at General Counsel Conference Midwest 2024: Mike Andolina, Partner, White & Case 1 minute read