0 results for 'undefined'
Eversheds Sutherland Boosts Global Revenue by 10 Percent
The results reflect the firm's second year post-merger.House Balks at Total Repeal of Medical Pot Smoking Ban
The House proposal, released Tuesday afternoon, would require doctors get the approval of a “case review panel” before they could order smokable marijuana for patients.King & Spalding Appoints Corporate Governance Advisory Leader
The firm has launched a new practice amid intensifiying pressures on corporate boardsDaily Dicta: 12 New Lateral Litigator Moves Not to Miss
Here's a look at a dozen recent litigator moves that could prove to be game-changers.Ethics Forum: Questions and Answers on Professional Responsibility
I read your column on how to address a judge. How does one address a judge who has been removed from their judicial office due to a suspension or removal by the Court of Judicial Discipline?View more book results for the query "*"
State Investigating Irregularities in Election Tossed Out Twice
The secretary of state confirmed it's investigating a “unique case” in northern Georgia. That election's results were tossed last week over illegal votes.Feds to Investigate Billionaire Epstein's Sex Plea Deal
Florida financier Jeffery Epstein reached a nonprosecution deal in 2008 with then-Miami U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta's office to secretly end a federal sex abuse investigation involving at least 40 teenage girls that could have landed him behind bars for life.Condemnation of Contaminated Property in the New Regulatory Environment
This article surveys the legal issues pertinent to the acquisition by a public entity via eminent domain of property that either presently requires environmental remediation or has been fully remediated.Court: Insurer Should Have Known Amount in Controversy Exceeded $75K From Complaint Alone
A federal district court in Pennsylvania has remanded an insurance coverage case to state court after deciding that the defendant insurer should have known that the amount in controversy exceeded $75,000 from the insureds' complaint and, therefore, that its removal months after the complaint was filed was untimely.Trending Stories