New York Law Journal | Analysis
By Catherine Nyarady and Crystal Parker | July 11, 2023
Many inventions build on or combine previously known elements, requiring the Patent Office and courts to determine which combinations of, or improvement on, previously known elements are entitled to protection. In doing so, whether or not the claimed invention is patentable often involves asking whether the invention provides unexpected results.
Delaware Business Court Insider | News
By Ellen Bardash | May 31, 2023
Alnylam Pharmaceuticals is represented in all its pending Delaware litigation by McDermott Will & Emery.
New York Law Journal | Analysis
By Rob Maier | May 23, 2023
The USPTO recently released proposed rulemaking that would address concerns raised by critics, and which are targeted at increasing predictability in PTAB proceedings.
By Dan Roe | April 6, 2023
A number of high-profile representations, frequently against the government, helped Wilmer find growth in a year that saw flat demand in transactional practices.
New York Law Journal | Analysis
By Charles Weiss | March 27, 2023
This column explores the use of in limine motions in patent litigation, beginning with commonly seen motions that fit comfortably into the traditional role of raising evidentiary issues before surveying the landscape of those extending beyond what used to be considered as conventional.
New York Law Journal | Analysis
By Rob Maier | March 21, 2023
In an increasingly software-based world, companies should be mindful of challenges, and best position themselves to raise—as needed—this Section 273 defense.
By Dan Roe | March 10, 2023
The 572-lawyer firm hired 16 lateral partners and replenished its associate ranks in a year when gross revenue rose 4%.
By Dan Roe | March 3, 2023
The intellectual property-focused firm boosted gross revenue and equity partner profits by roughly 10% in 2022.
By Justin Henry | January 5, 2023
The combination, which went into effect Jan. 1, boosts the firm's head count to 170 lawyers.
New York Law Journal | Analysis
By Rob Maier | November 22, 2022
In his Patents and Trademarks column, Rob Maier discusses 'In re Fedex', where the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit granted a petition for writ of mandamus and ordered an Eastern District of Texas district court to reconsider a denial of a motion seeking a transfer of venue for convenience. The author notes that the court's analysis may provide helpful guidance for future cases on the issue.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The New York Law Journal honors attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession in New York.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Truly exceptional Bergen County New Jersey Law Firm is growing and seeks strong plaintiff's personal injury Attorney with 5-7 years plaintif...
Epstein Becker & Green is seeking an associate to joins its Commercial Litigation practice in our Columbus or Cincinnati offices. Ca...
McCarter & English, LLP, a well established and growing law firm, is actively seeking a talented and driven associate having 2-5 years o...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS