By Diane P. Sullivan and Jed P. Winer | March 6, 2020
This list will serve as a practical starting point to begin developing creative points for an effective cross-examination of the other side's expert.
New York Law Journal | Commentary
By Arthur M. Diamond | February 28, 2020
The jury should have the option of seeing the actual testimony as they had it during the trial.
New York Law Journal | Analysis
By David B. Newman and Matthew L. Lippert | February 25, 2020
Relying on assumptions about how things are usually done, or how the arbitrator(s) will eventually decide they ought to be done, can result in very unpleasant surprises.
New York Law Journal | Commentary
By Angela Turturro | February 20, 2020
This essay is a "step back" from the author's tenure in different roles at the Court of Appeals spanning the last quarter of the last century. The reminiscences recounted here, however, are from his more recent endeavors as a witness in various cases.
New York Law Journal | Commentary
By Joseph W. Bellacosa | February 13, 2020
This essay is a "step back" from the author's tenure in different roles at the Court of Appeals spanning the last quarter of the last century. The reminiscences recounted here, however, are from his more recent endeavors as a witness in various cases.
New York Law Journal | Analysis
By David B. Newman and Matthew L. Lippert | February 6, 2020
The intersection of specialized, often highly technical, or esoteric subject matter with procedural freedom can result in confusion about the ground rules for the use of experts in the arbitration.
New York Law Journal | Commentary
By Joseph W. Bellacosa | February 6, 2020
This essay is a "step back" from the author's tenure in different roles at the Court of Appeals spanning the last quarter of the last century. The reminiscences recounted here, however, are from his more recent endeavors as a witness in various cases.
New York Law Journal | Analysis
By Toby Kleinman and Daniel Pollack | December 18, 2019
There are many considerations before making a decision to file an emergent appeal.
New York Law Journal | Analysis
By Toby Kleinman and Daniel Pollack | November 18, 2019
The legal obligation of an expert witness is to provide independent advice to the court by presenting impartial, unbiased opinions about matters within their field of expertise. This duty is owed singularly to the court and supersedes any duty to the attorney or litigants. Your job, as the attorney, is to find the right expert for each case. One size does not fit all.
New York Law Journal | Analysis
By Michael Hoenig | November 8, 2019
In his Complex Litigation column, Michael Hoenig discusses a recent trial court decision that teaches valuable lessons for lawyers as it wrestles on how to decide an exquisite battle of expert opinions by well-qualified neurologists. Litigators may well take sides on this interesting one.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The New York Law Journal honors attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession in New York.
Celebrate outstanding achievement in law firms, chambers, in-house legal departments and alternative business structures.
The Daily Report is honoring those attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession.
Associate attorney position at NJ Immigration Law firm: Leschak & Associates, LLC, based in Freehold, NJ, is looking for a full time ass...
Company Description CourtLaw Injury Lawyers is an established Personal Injury Law Firm with its primary office located in Perth Amboy, New J...
Black Owl Recruiting is looking for a number of qualified applicants to fill positions for a highly reputable client. Recent experience work...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS