IT WOULD have been impossible for a New York County Supreme Court clerk to backdate an asbestos claim on behalf of Weitz & Luxenberg, and the lawyers who made that charge in a lawsuit should be sanctioned, according to attorneys for the firm.
May 17, 2002 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The allegations, Mr. Abramowitz said in his memorandum, “are riddled with factual defects . . . .”
IT WOULD have been impossible for a New York County Supreme Court clerk to backdate an asbestos claim on behalf of Weitz & Luxenberg, and the lawyers who made that charge in a lawsuit should be sanctioned, according to attorneys for the firm.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The New York Law Journal honors attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession in New York.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Atlanta s John Marshall Law School is seeking to hire one or more full-time, visiting Legal WritingInstructors to teach Legal Research, Anal...
Shipman is seeking an associate to join our Labor & Employment practice in our Hartford, New Haven, or Stamford office. Candidates shou...
Evergreen Trading is a media investment firm headquartered in NYC. We help brands achieve their goals by leveraging their unwanted assets to...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
