Warren A. Estis and Michael E. Feinstein ()
In the 1963 decision of the Appellate Division, First Department Rosenstiel v. Rosenstiel, 20 A.D.2d 71 (1st Dept. 1963), the court first set forth what has since become known as the “familial exception” to the maintenance of a summary proceeding pursuant to Section 713(7) of the Real Property Actions and Proceedings Law (RPAPL). That section permits the maintenance of a summary proceeding against persons who are in occupancy of real property pursuant to a license which has been revoked.
To view this content, please continue to Lexis Advance®.
Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber? Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via Lexis Advance®. This includes content from the National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.
ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at firstname.lastname@example.org