The judge in a suit over the wrongful handling of bundled mortgages by JPMorgan Chase & Co. refused, with conditions, to seal testimony by two employees of a mortgage processing company that admitted during depositions to taking questionable actions on behalf of the bank.
May 16, 2017 at 04:03 PM
1 minute read
The judge in a suit over the wrongful handling of bundled mortgages by JPMorgan Chase & Co. refused, with conditions, to seal testimony by two employees of a mortgage processing company that admitted during depositions to taking questionable actions on behalf of the bank.
Southern District Magistrate Judge James Francis IV sided with the plaintiffs in Mortgage Resolution Servicing v. JPMorgan Chase Bank,15-cv-00293, finding that the deponents failed to meet the burden for protection.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The New York Law Journal honors attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession in New York.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Truly exceptional Bergen County New Jersey Law Firm is growing and seeks strong plaintiff's personal injury Attorney with 5-7 years plaintif...
Shipman is seeking an associate to join our Labor & Employment practice in our Hartford, New Haven, or Stamford office. Candidates shou...
Evergreen Trading is a media investment firm headquartered in NYC. We help brands achieve their goals by leveraging their unwanted assets to...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
