Thomas F. Gleason ()
In Pegasus Aviation I v. Varig Logistica S.A,1 the Court of Appeals held that a party seeking sanctions for spoliation of evidence must show that the party controlling the evidence possessed an obligation to preserve it at the time of its destruction; that the evidence was destroyed with a “culpable state of mind” (meaning intentionally; with gross negligence or ordinary negligence2); and that the evidence was relevant to the party’s claim or defense.3 The latter two requirements are mostly factual, but the first requirement (the duty to preserve) is imposed by law. Where does this legal obligation to preserve evidence come from?
To view this content, please continue to Lexis Advance®.
Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber? Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via Lexis Advance®. This includes content from the National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.
ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at firstname.lastname@example.org