A Commercial Division judge has rejected most of the summary judgment arguments made by owners of Palm, a famed Manhattan steakhouse, and ruled the dispute between descendants of the restaurant's two founders can go to trial.
March 01, 2016 at 10:00 AM
1 minute read
A Commercial Division judge has rejected most of the summary judgment arguments made by owners of Palm, a famed Manhattan steakhouse, and ruled the dispute between descendants of the restaurant’s two founders can go to trial.
Justice Jeffrey Oing said in a Feb. 11 ruling that the grandchildren of one of the founders can proceed with their suit against their cousin and the other founder’s grandson.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The New York Law Journal honors attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession in New York.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
