Jurors, who have been deliberating in the Dewey & LeBoeuf criminal trial since last Wednesday, asked Justice Robert Stolz whether ''false" in reference to adjustments in accounting means illegal and whether "inappropriate," in reference to adjustments, in accounting mean illegal.
September 23, 2015 at 06:00 AM
1 minute read
Acting Supreme Court Justice Robert Stolz provided clarity Tuesday to jurors inquiring about accounting adjustments at the core of the Dewey & LeBoeuf criminal trial.
Prosecutors have alleged ex-Dewey chairman Steven Davis, former executive director Stephen DiCarmine and former chief financial officer Joel Sanders oversaw a scheme to make adjustments to the firm’s financial records, deceiving lenders and investors. Prosecutors and some witnesses described the adjustments as false or wrong.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The New York Law Journal honors attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession in New York.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Atlanta s John Marshall Law School is seeking to hire one or more full-time, visiting Legal WritingInstructors to teach Legal Research, Anal...
Shipman is seeking an associate to join our Labor & Employment practice in our Hartford, New Haven, or Stamford office. Candidates shou...
Evergreen Trading is a media investment firm headquartered in NYC. We help brands achieve their goals by leveraging their unwanted assets to...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
