A Brooklyn judge found a lineup identification of an attempted murder suspect was "unduly suggestive" because the defendant appeared with five others who were too dissimilar in appearance from him.
July 28, 2015 at 05:03 AM
1 minute read
A Brooklyn judge found a lineup identification of an attempted murder suspect was “unduly suggestive” because the defendant appeared with five others who were too dissimilar in appearance from him.
Supreme Court Justice Vincent Del Giudice wrote in People v. Newman, 8135-2007, that the lineup-fillers ranged in age from 25 to 47, all considerably older than 17-year-old defendant Dante Newman.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The New York Law Journal honors attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession in New York.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Atlanta s John Marshall Law School is seeking to hire one or more full-time, visiting Legal WritingInstructors to teach Legal Research, Anal...
Shipman is seeking an associate to join our Labor & Employment practice in our Hartford, New Haven, or Stamford office. Candidates shou...
Evergreen Trading is a media investment firm headquartered in NYC. We help brands achieve their goals by leveraging their unwanted assets to...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
