The fact that a phone number is reassigned does not shield a company from liability under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act for "robocalling" consumers without their consent, a federal judge has ruled.
July 13, 2015 at 09:00 AM
1 minute read
The fact that a phone number is reassigned does not shield a company from liability under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act for “robocalling” consumers without their consent, a federal judge has ruled.
As a result, Southern District Judge Alvin Hellerstein awarded Aracelli King of Texas more than $200,000 for receiving 153 unwanted calls from Time Warner Cable starting in 2013.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The New York Law Journal honors attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession in New York.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Shipman is seeking an associate to join our Labor & Employment practice in our Hartford, New Haven, or Stamford office. Candidates shou...
Evergreen Trading is a media investment firm headquartered in NYC. We help brands achieve their goals by leveraging their unwanted assets to...
Duane Morris seeks an associate with 3-4 years of experience to join its Employee Benefits and Executive Compensation Group in its Philadelp...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
